<html><head></head><body><div class="ydpf36c802dyahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:16px;"><div><div>Dear colleagues, </div><div><br></div><div>Per the discussion in today's meeting, I have added rows 17-19, for D with <span><span style="font-family: Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 16px;">circumflex below,</span></span> to the Underlining Analysis spreadsheet </div><div><span><a href="https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19FZmntXOan_7LF0ckzKZNLrla0L8eC_GxWEfAmmOMkU/edit#gid=1543789122" rel="nofollow" target="_blank" class="">https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19FZmntXOan_7LF0ckzKZNLrla0L8eC_GxWEfAmmOMkU/edit#gid=1543789122</a> </span><div><br></div><div>Please add your ratings for those glyphs. </div><div><br></div>Thank you</div><div><br></div><div class="ydpf36c802dsignature">Bill Jouris<br>Inside Products<br>bill.jouris@insidethestack.com<br>831-659-8360<br>925-855-9512 (direct)</div></div>
<div><br></div><div><br></div>
</div><div id="yahoo_quoted_1076777674" class="yahoo_quoted">
<div style="font-family:'Helvetica Neue', Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:13px;color:#26282a;">
<div>
On Friday, June 14, 2019, 10:35:03 AM PDT, Bill Jouris <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com> wrote:
</div>
<div><br></div>
<div><br></div>
<div><div id="yiv1089795644"><div><div class="yiv1089795644ydp6e86acd9yahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:16px;"><div><div>Dear colleagues, </div><div><br></div><div>I've been pulling together the list of variants due to underlining, and I noticed something. In every case where we did a full group review of a letter with "circumflex below", the final decision was that it was a variant. But there was one letter (D) which did not get a full group review because, by chance, both the original two reviewers were folks who consistently didn't see the circumflex below as a variant. It seems to me that, as a matter of consistency, if we generally see a circumflex below as something that cannot be distinguished from the letter alone, we should revise the finding for D to conform. </div><div><br></div><div>Does anyone have a problem with me making that addition? </div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div class="yiv1089795644ydp6e86acd9signature">Bill Jouris<br>Inside Products<br>bill.jouris@insidethestack.com<br>831-659-8360<br>925-855-9512 (direct)</div></div></div></div></div>_______________________________________________<br>Latingp mailing list<br><a ymailto="mailto:Latingp@icann.org" href="mailto:Latingp@icann.org">Latingp@icann.org</a><br><a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/latingp" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/latingp</a><br><br>_______________________________________________<br>By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy</a>) and the website Terms of Service (<a href="https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos" target="_blank">https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos</a>). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.</div>
</div>
</div></body></html>