<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Times New Roman \(Body CS\)";
panose-1:2 2 6 3 5 4 5 2 3 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Helvetica Neue";
panose-1:2 0 5 3 0 0 0 2 0 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0
{mso-style-name:msonormal;
mso-margin-top-alt:auto;
margin-right:0cm;
mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto;
margin-left:0cm;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Courier New";
color:windowtext;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt 70.85pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style>
</head>
<body lang="SV" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Courier New";mso-fareast-language:EN-US">It seems like we have to accept that the IDNA 2003 behavior will stay for quite some time. Besides Chrome and IE, which predates the release of IDNA 2008, even
Microsoft Edge, which is a new web browser has the IDNA 2003 behavior on Sharp S.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Courier New";mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Courier New";mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Users of those browsers will not be able to reach domain names under a TLD with sharp S unless there is an activated variant with double S. I really think that
is a significant problem. I think we agree that the behavior of those browsers is unwanted, but I am not sure that we should consider it to be a bug that will be fixed.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Courier New";mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Courier New";mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Courier New";mso-fareast-language:EN-US">Mats<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family:"Courier New";mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:black">---</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:black">Mats Dufberg</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:black">DNS Specialist<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:black">Internetstiftelsen (The Swedish Internet Foundation)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:black">Mobile: +46 73 065 3899</span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Courier New";color:black"><a href="https://internetstiftelsen.se/"><span style="color:#954F72">https://internetstiftelsen.se/</span></a></span><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black"><o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Courier New";mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-family:"Courier New";mso-fareast-language:EN-US"><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">From: </span></b><span style="font-size:12.0pt;color:black">Latingp <latingp-bounces@icann.org> on behalf of Bill Jouris <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com><br>
<b>Reply to: </b>Bill Jouris <bill.jouris@insidethestack.com><br>
<b>Date: </b>Monday, 19 August 2019 at 15:32<br>
<b>To: </b>ICANN Latin GP <latingp@icann.org><br>
<b>Subject: </b>[Latingp] Latin Small Letter Sharp S (ß) U+00DF<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<div id="ydpd3bf8cedyiv7597690470">
<div>
<div>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica Neue"">Dear colleagues,
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica Neue""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica Neue"">I had a couple of thoughts over the weekend.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica Neue""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica Neue"">First, I think that in order to make progress we need to unpack our analysis a little. In particular, we need to consider each option, for both misconnection and failure of connection,
separately for IDNA 2003 and for IDNA 2008. Then we will have the information in front of us to decide how much of a problem we have.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica Neue""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica Neue"">For example, consider Option 2 (Sharp S and double S as blocked variants). (For this discussion, assume a TLD using the Sharp S exists. Thus the TLD which only differs by having
a double S is blocked.) If the user enters a valid domain name using the Sharp S, on a browser which uses IDNA 2003, the browser converts it to double s before going to the DNS. The DNS doesn't find the name, and so the connection fails. Whereas a browser
with IDNA 2008 goes to the DNS with the correct name, and the connection succeeds.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica Neue""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica Neue"">Does this constitute a change of behavior? Absolutely. But is this change, "instability" if you will, a significant problem? I would suggest that it is not. To call it a significant
problem is to argue that bugs should not be fixed. A bug fix, after all, necessarily results in a change of behavior; that is its whole purpose. Back-level software (which IDNA 2003 is) will always give problematic results. That's why we upgrade.
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica Neue""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica Neue"">Certainly an ideal solution will have no misconnection under either level of IDNA, and no failed connection when the user enters a valid domain name. But unless we find such a
paragon, we will need to find the "least bad" solution. And having this additional data in front of us will help with that.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica Neue""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica Neue""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica Neue"">Second, I want to comment on the Option for Sharp S and double S with no variant relationship. I have a question for those who are more fluent in German than I -- which is most
of you. Are there any examples of two different German words which are identical except that one is rendered with a Sharp S and the other is rendered strictly with a double S? <o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica Neue""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica Neue"">It seems to me that, unless there are, a "not variant" judgement is unsustainable and the option should be rejected out of hand. Regardless of what this analysis might find.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica Neue""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica Neue""><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Helvetica Neue"">Bill Jouris<br>
Inside Products<br>
bill.jouris@insidethestack.com<br>
831-659-8360<br>
925-855-9512 (direct)<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>