<html><head></head><body><div class="ydp911bf2b6yahoo-style-wrap" style="font-family:Helvetica Neue, Helvetica, Arial, sans-serif;font-size:16px;"><div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">Dear Colleagues, </div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">Attached is my draft of possible responses to the IP comments on visual variants. I have used the same <font color="#cd232c">[response]</font> approach used for comments in the Proposal. </div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false"><br></div><div dir="ltr" data-setdir="false">Briefly, I think that we should continue to use the same font size that we have been using all along. There is no question that differences, between glyphs or between diacritics, can be seen at sufficient magnification. See the differences between breve and caron. But we know users are not going to stop and zoom in on links. And I think we need to push back on several of these comments on that basis. </div><div><br></div><div class="ydp911bf2b6signature">Bill Jouris<br>Inside Products<br>bill.jouris@insidethestack.com<br>831-659-8360<br>925-855-9512 (direct)</div></div></div></body></html>