<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><br class=""><div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="">Em 4 de set de 2019, à(s) 14:59:000, Danny McPherson <<a href="mailto:danny@tcb.net" class="">danny@tcb.net</a>> escreveu:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><div class=""><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" class=""><div dir="auto" class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""></div><div dir="ltr" class=""><br class=""></div><div dir="ltr" class=""><br class="">On Sep 4, 2019, at 4:33 PM, Rubens Kuhl <<a href="mailto:rubensk@nic.br" class="">rubensk@nic.br</a>><br class=""></div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">Tell that to those affected by those expired domains:</div><div class=""><a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPbyDSvGasw" class="">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZPbyDSvGasw</a></div></div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><div class="">That doesn’t make them name collisions and they’re expressly out of the scope of this NCAP work just like the old bit-squatting stuff as well. If we’re kitchen-sinking it there’s a whole list of gunk you can put in there.</div><br class=""><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div dir="ltr" class=""><div class="">That's why this topic was included in the SubPro charter, and is still a matter of discussion. </div></div></blockquote><div class=""><br class=""></div><span style="background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0);" class="">Nothing surprises me there. If you think there’s an issue with expired domains and their registration by new registrants then perhaps bring it up where it should be discussed - not as a distraction attack in SubPro.</span></div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>GNSO is where gTLD policy is discussed, and the GNSO charter for SubPro states:</div><div><a href="https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/filefield_48475/subsequent-procedures-charter-21jan16-en.pdf" class="">https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/filefield_48475/subsequent-procedures-charter-21jan16-en.pdf</a></div><div><br class=""></div><div>"Name collisions: How should name collisions be incorporated into future new gTLD
rounds? What measures may be needed to manage risks for 2012-round gTLDs beyond
their 2 year anniversary of delegation, or gTLDs delegated prior to the 2012 round?"</div><div><br class=""></div><div>(Note the use of name collisions name for this, contrary to what is said above)</div><div><br class=""></div><div>This part of charter came from the issue report, which can be found at <a href="https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/2016-12/subsequent-procedures-final-issue-04dec15-en.pdf" class="">https://gnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/file/field-file-attach/2016-12/subsequent-procedures-final-issue-04dec15-en.pdf</a> . So there should be no surprise for things being discussed for some years now... </div><div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><div>Rubens</div><div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><br class=""></body></html>