<html><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class=""><div><blockquote type="cite" class=""><div class="WordSection1" style="page: WordSection1; caret-color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: Helvetica; font-size: 12px; font-style: normal; font-variant-caps: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; text-align: start; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; word-spacing: 0px; -webkit-text-stroke-width: 0px; text-decoration: none;"><br class=""><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 56, 100);" class=""><span style="color: rgb(112, 48, 160);" class=""><o:p class=""> </o:p></span></div><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 56, 100);" class=""><span style="color: rgb(112, 48, 160);" class="">Although Sub Pro has not yet considered the language of its Final Report, some in Sub Pro Leadership have said that since no Consensus appears to exist on adopting a new Name Collision Framework, the Sub Pro WG is required to fall back to the 90-day Controlled Interruption practice used in the 2012 round, However, numerous public commenters filed comment on the Sub Pro Initial Report stating that Sub Pro should "defer to the SSAC". I assume the Sub Pro Final Report will note the "deference to SSAC" but it appears possible that Leadership may not feel comfortable designating that as a Consensus opinion. (I am sure Jeff and Rubens will advise when that discussion occurs – and may even send the proposed text of the Final Report to the NCAP if we establish a way to work together.) <span class="Apple-converted-space"> </span><o:p class=""></o:p></span></div><div style="margin: 0in 0in 0.0001pt; font-size: 12pt; font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; color: rgb(31, 56, 100);" class=""><span style="color: rgb(112, 48, 160);" class=""><o:p class=""> </o:p></span></div></div></blockquote><br class=""></div><div>I wouldn't qualify 2 as as numerous comments supporting deferring to SSAC. One cluster was IPC/USPS, the other was ALAC. When analysing comments, they are usually deduplicated to more accurately represent diversity. </div><div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><div><br class=""></div><div>Rubens</div><div><br class=""></div></body></html>