[Neobrahmigp] IP feedback on the Draft Devanagari LGR

Mon Oct 9 17:51:55 UTC 2017

Dear Akshat and All,
Going through the feedback from IP, I don't see much that can be added
specifically for Devanagari-based languages spoken in Nepal (Nepali, Newar
and Tamang). I just wanted to add a few information based on some of the
comments from the IP feedback  document:

1. Reference for keyboard layout for Nepali:[Nepali Unicode
Romanized/Traditional]
http://ltk.org.np/keyboard_layouts.php

Although some unicode based Newar keyboard layouts are said to exist, they
don't seem to be publicly available. Tamang does not yet have a separate
unicode based keyboard layout of its own. So, the above two layouts for
Nepali can be referenced as the official keyboard layouts for the
Devanagari based languages in Nepal.

2. As far as halanta ending labels are concerned, I am putting the excerpt
from the input document we provided earlier below:

----------------

In Nepali, there is growing trend to use or drop the “halanta” character at
the end of word and vice-versa. There are just a limited set of such words
in the Nepali dictionary.

For example,

परिषद् vs परिषद

संवत् vs संवत

सांसद् vs सांसद

Any word with/without halanta ending should be treated as a “blocked”
variant.

--------------

>From the above, we can infer that the halanta ending in labels is not a
very strict requirement for Nepali. So should there be a consensus to drop
the case, we are fine with that as well.

Regards,

Bal Krishna

---
Bal Krishna Bal,PhD
Assistant Professor
Lead Researcher - Information and Language Processing Research Lab
Department of Computer Science and Engineering
Kathmandu, University
Dhulikhel, Kavre
Nepal
Homepage: http://ku.edu.np/cse/faculty/bal

On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain at icann.org>
wrote:

> Dear All,
>
>
>
> Thank you for sharing the draft of the Devanagari Root Zone LGR proposal
> for review by the Integration Panel.
>
>
>
> Please find attached their feedback containing the following documents:
>
>
>
>    1. Feedback document from IP
>    2. Updated XML file, per the feedback
>    3. Corresponding (more readable) HTML version derived from the XML file
>
>
>
> Please let us know if you have any queries about the feedback.  You are
> requested to consider the feedback as you update the proposal.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Sarmad
>
>
>
> *From:* neobrahmigp-bounces at icann.org [mailto:neobrahmigp-bounces@
> icann.org] *On Behalf Of *Sarmad Hussain
> *Sent:* Sunday, September 10, 2017 12:12 AM
> *To:* Akshat Joshi <akshatj at cdac.in>; NeobrahmiGP at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Neobrahmigp] Draft Devanagari LGR
>
>
>
> Thank you Akshat, All.
>
>
>
> We have forwarded the proposal documents to IP for feedback, along with
> the queries in the email.
>
>
>
> We will get back to you with their response soon.
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Sarmad
>
>
>
> *From:* neobrahmigp-bounces at icann.org [mailto:neobrahmigp-bounces@
> icann.org <neobrahmigp-bounces at icann.org>] *On Behalf Of *Akshat Joshi
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 07, 2017 11:59 PM
> *To:* NeobrahmiGP at icann.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Neobrahmigp] Draft Devanagari LGR
>
>
>
> Dear  All,
>
> Please find attached, copy of the Devanagari LGR which can be submitted to
> Integration Panel for their early comments.
>
> The Devanagari LGR document is also accompanied with the XML file of the
> same.
>
> Dr. Data you may please take this to the IP with following points:
>
> 1. In the XML, framing of the rule "follows-only-C-or-CN" has been done as
> per our understanding. It may need corrections. Request IP to suggest.
>
> 2. Variants:
>
>     - As per reciprocity of variants, the variant sequences have been
> reproduced in the <data> section. It may need corrections. Request IP to
> suggest.
>
>     - The "Halant ending" variants mentioned in section 6.2 in LGR
> document is a case of conditional and null variant. It was not clear how to
> put that in XML. It has not been done. Request IP to suggest.
>
> 3. Some of the language's data is expected to be received in few days.
> Once received, that too will be incorporated into this. Those have been
> marked in red.
>
> Regards,
>
> Akshat Joshi
>
>
>
> On 28-08-2017 17:58, Akshat Joshi wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> Please find attached, most recent version of the Devangari LGR with all
> the suggestions/changes incorporated till date.
>
> We are still in process of getting information on the languages which use
> Devanagari, fall within EGIDS scale 1 to 4 and are yet to be covered by the
> NBGP. If we can complete that by end of August, we will release the final
> version of the Devanagari LGR document which can be sent to Integration
> Panel for their review.
>
> I hope this pre-final draft will act as a good basis for tomorrow's call.
>
>
>
> There are two things that I have marked in red in the document.
> 1. The name of the accompanying XML file which we will finalize after the
> finalization of the LGR rules and repertoire. You may please ignore that
> for now.
> 2. Some of the languages which are yet to be taken into account
>
> Major changes done to the document are:
> 1. Changes suggested by Dr. Bal regarding name change to Newar and Nepali
> being official language of Nepal
> 2. Additional Halanta ending variant has been added (up for discussion)
> 3. Principles for inclusion of characters have been added in Guiding
> Principles section (up for discussion)
> 4. The case of V preceded by an H has been explicitly mentioned under the
> WLE section (up for discussion)
>
> Regards,
> Akshat Joshi
>
> On 04-08-2017 17:57, Akshat Joshi wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> Please find attached, draft LGR document for Devanagari.
> Request all to give the feedback on the same so that it can be finally
> modified for sending across to the Integration Panel for comments.
>
> There are two things that I have marked in red in the document.
> 1. The name of the accompanying XML file which we will finalize after the
> finalization of the LGR rules and repertoire. You may please ignore that
> for now.
> 2. Some of the languages which are yet to be taken into account
>
> Apart from that, I have taken into consideration the feedback received for
> Nepali and Newari . Only the Variants have not been taken into account as
> they conflict with the "No confusingly similar cases as Variants" policy of
> LGR Procedure. I will separately reply to the proposed variants in Nepali
> and Newari. However, some such cases pertaining to Santhali have been added
> to the Variant table. We can discuss the same over the mails. If required,
> will make further changes if needed.
>
> Major changes done to the document are:
> 1. Akshar formation rules have been simplified and inapplicable cases have
> been removed e.g. Avagraha and Digits
> 2. Anusvara and Chandrabindu have been made separate categories as
> discussed in the Kathmandu F2F meet.
> 3. Santhali nukta requirements have been incorporated and the WLE section
> has been modified accordingly.
> 4. List of languages has been modified as per the EGIDS scale 1 to 4
> 5. Guiding principles have been added for code-point selection
> 6. Code-points as required by Sindhi and Kashmiri have been added
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Akshat Joshi
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> [ C-DAC is on Social-Media too. Kindly follow us at:
> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CDACINDIA[facebook.com]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_CDACINDIA&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=KTETvEaGPwPcawI-QmNa-kiv-ZBvdgyyLm-mxd028M4&m=IXLiKWGt8wMq5W69PohCJWJMLPCmkzZ87Io9DFqhgWY&s=4SOEbDjNC6ZTH4t37x6XQpkhBwEU2jQOtDEXeD6B8G8&e=>
> & Twitter: @cdacindia ]
>
> This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
> contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
> all copies and the original message. Any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email
> is strictly prohibited and appropriate legal action will be taken.
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Neobrahmigp mailing list
>
> Neobrahmigp at icann.org
>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/neobrahmigp
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Akshat Joshi
>
> C-DAC GIST
>
>
>
> --
>
> Regards,
>
> Akshat Joshi
>
> C-DAC GIST
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> [ C-DAC is on Social-Media too. Kindly follow us at:
> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CDACINDIA[facebook.com]
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.facebook.com_CDACINDIA&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=KTETvEaGPwPcawI-QmNa-kiv-ZBvdgyyLm-mxd028M4&m=L2aStkGaed6Sxoj6c8Kd9hbMay_ludETLFo4jw5mvEY&s=A-4L7G3OIhKtkhXUaQrupibn8Z0pAbVUy6Rg9uJRWYI&e=>
> & Twitter: @cdacindia ]
>
> This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
> contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
> all copies and the original message. Any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email
> is strictly prohibited and appropriate legal action will be taken.
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Neobrahmigp mailing list
> Neobrahmigp at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/neobrahmigp
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/neobrahmigp/attachments/20171009/25a6aae0/attachment-0001.html>