[Neobrahmigp] IP-Response-on-Devanagari LGR Proposal

[Udaya Narayana Singh]

This is a great task done. May I request Kuldeep and Pavanaja/Dhanalakshmi
to quickly see and certify that there are no additional cases of
cross-script variants vis-a-vis Deva-Nagari wrt your scripts. I expect none
(esp because Telugu answer has already come) but it would still be
mandatory to get your email response without which we can't make submission
to the Integration Panel.

Thanks and waiting to hear from you three,

Udaya Narayana Singh (from Santiniketan now)

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018, 00:02 Akshat Joshi <akshatj at cdac.in> wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> Please find attached, modified Devanagari LGR document with all the
> changes as suggested by IP accommodated/responded to. This is accompanied
> with following files.
> 1. Devanagari LGR modified XML file. ( modified as per IP feedback and
> additional Bengali cross-script variants)
> 2. Test Labels file (with more labels covering almost entire
> character-set, all the exclusion code-points) (Thanks to Neha Gupta for
> this.)
> 3. A separate file that contains the labels that produce variants.
> 4. Response to IP for each of the individual changes suggested by them.
>
> As discussed during the F2F I have added the possible Bengali cross-script
> variants in Devanagari.
>
> Additional text regarding ZWJ and ZWNJ has also been added which can (and
> most probably should) be used by all the other script LGRs (Last paragraph
> of Point 4.1.2.1 ii)
>
> Gurumukhi variants have also been harmonized and the tables updated
> accordingly.
>
> A short paragraph describing the process of harmonization of cross-script
> variants has also been added at the end of the point 6.5.
>
> While we await the responses on the mailing list for extensive
> cross-script analysis of other scripts with Devanagari (I have already
> heard from Malayalam, Tamil, Telugu, Gurmukhi, Bengali and Gujarati about
> not having any additional cases of cross-script variants) I have already
> added the line in Devanagari LGR that no cases were found. As I am
> travelling from tomorrow onwards for a week, I may have limited
> connectivity hence sending in advance. Once we get confirmation from all
> the scripts (which we most probably will), I request co-chairs to consider
> as a submission to IP.
>
> Regards,
> Akshat Joshi
>
> On March 30, 2018 at 11:44 PM Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain at icann.org>
> wrote:
>
> Dear Akshat,
>
> Please find attached the following:
>
> 1) IP response for Devanagari (Proposal of 2018-01-30)
> 2) LGR proposal, as originally sent
> 3) Current associated XML
>
> You are requested to kindly consider the feedback and update the proposal
> accordingly.  Please let us know if you have any queries.
>
> Regards,
> Sarmad
>
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> [ C-DAC is on Social-Media too. Kindly follow us at:
> Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CDACINDIA & Twitter: @cdacindia ]
>
> This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
> contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the
> intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
> all copies and the original message. Any unauthorized review, use,
> disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email
> is strictly prohibited and appropriate legal action will be taken.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/neobrahmigp/attachments/20180430/990b5ef2/attachment.html>