[Neobrahmigp] Bangla LGR proposal v3.17

Udaya Narayana Singh unsciil51 at gmail.com
Fri Aug 10 13:08:01 UTC 2018


Very pertinent observations. Could Atiur and Rajib make a note of these
points and respond as well as make necessary changes.

Regards,

Udaya Narayana Singh

On Fri, Aug 10, 2018, 17:59 Neha Gupta <nehag at cdac.in> wrote:

> Dear Pitinan, All
>
>
>
> Below are my observations on document “Bangla_LGR_20180809.pdf”.
>
>
>
> ·         Double dotted circle appeared in table 7.
>
> ·         Either of “Ref” or “Repha” should be used throughout the
> document.
>
> ·         Section 6.1 In Script Variants; Case II
>
> o   Section may have sub heading as Repha and Ra-phala for clear reading
>
> o   the note "*Note: As Bangla and Assamese **ক and **ঠ look exactly the
> same, the resultant combinations with 'Ref' look identical. Addition of
> 'Ref' does not make any difference*." below the table 12 is little
> ambiguous. It may be rephrased to "Note: The Ra+Hasant+Consonant
> combination formed either by Bangla and Assamese Ra produce the same glyph
> as shown in the table 12. Hence the resultant glyph despite having
> different code point values looks exactly the same"
>
> ·         Section 6.2
>
> o   the text says the cross script study done for Oriya too, however
> there is no text or table with respect to Oriya in the following text.
>
> o   NBGP mistyped as NBPG
>
> ·         Section 7.1
>
> o   point 1: Neither য় YYA (U+09DF), ড় RRA (U+09DC) and ঢ় RRHA (U+09DD)
> characters are added into Section 5.1 "Code Point Repertoire Inclusion" nor
> the equivalent form i.e. “য”YA (U+09AF)+”়”Nukta (U+09BC), "ড"DDA
> (U+09A1)+”়” Nukta (U+09BC) and "ঢ"DDHA (U+09A2)+”়” Nukta (U+09BC) added
> in this point. It means that these characters/combinations are not the part
> of Bangla LGR at this point. Please make sure if this is intended.
>
> o   Point 2: Category “N” has not been added with C. Will there be no
> possibility of CNH?
>
> o   Point 4: category “N” is missing from list. However in example, we
> cited an example of CND i.e. ঝ়ঁ
>
> o   Point 5 : Similarly, is there no possibility of CNX?
>
>
>
>
>
> Thanks & Regards,
>
> Neha Gupta
>
> C-DAC GIST
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Neobrahmigp [mailto:neobrahmigp-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of
> Pitinan Kooarmornpatana
> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2018 11:09 AM
> To: neo brahmi
> Subject: [Neobrahmigp] Bangla LGR proposal v3.17
>
>
>
> Dear NBGP members,
>
>
>
> Please find attached the Bangla LGR proposal v3.17 date 2018-08-09 for
> your consideration.
>
>
>
> This version has taken valuable inputs from the face to face meeting in
> Dhaka into account and update the Bangla LGR proposal accordingly.
>
>
>
> The major edits are:
>
>
>
> 1. Updated 'Section 3 Background on Script and Languages Using It'.
>
> 2. Changed the following terms through out the document.
>
>                 a. Replaced ‘Bengali’ with ‘Bangla'
>
>                 b. Replaced ‘Assamese' with ‘Asamiya'
>
>                 c. Replaced ‘Halant’ with ‘Hasanta’
>
> 3. Edited the Whole Label Evaluation Rule, update the set of characters
> which the Nukta can follow. Please see section 7.1 Rule1 page 43.
>
> 4. Added Appendix II 'Bengali consonants and their allographs’ page 55.
>
> 5. Updated Contributors list. Please see section 8 page 47.
>
>
>
> Please note that only in the code point repertoire where the names of code
> points remain as Unicode standard terms. We understand that there is the
> requirement to use the term ‘Bangla’, however,  technically, the system
> will automatically retrieve the names defined in the standard which is out
> of NBGP or ICANN control. Please see table 8, 9, 10 page 32-33.
>
>
>
> Kindly let us know your feedback or suggestions.
>
> We are also taking this package for the Integration Panel to review in
> parallel.
>
>
>
> With warm regards,
>
> Pitinan.
>
> ………………………...
>
>
>
> List of attachments:
>
>
>
> 1. Bangla LGR in Word (Bangla_LGR_20180809.docx)
>
> 2. Bangla LGR in Pdf (Bangla_LGR_20180809.pdf)
>
>
>
> 3. XML (proposal-lgr-bangla-20180809.xml)
>
> 4. HTML (Proposal-Lgr-Bangla-20180809.htm)
>
>
>
> 5. Test labels (test-label-bangla-20180809.xml)
>
> 6. Test label results (test-label-bangla-20180809-result.txt)
>
>
>
> 7. Larger set labels (Bengali-test-labels.txt)
>
> 8. Lager set label test results (annotation_proposal-lgr-beng-20180808.txt)
>
>
>
> ---
> Copyright (C) 2018 C-DAC India, www.cdac.in
> facebook: cdacindia, twitter: @cdacindia
> ---
> _______________________________________________
> Neobrahmigp mailing list
> Neobrahmigp at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/neobrahmigp
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/neobrahmigp/attachments/20180810/d08bf039/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the Neobrahmigp mailing list