[Neobrahmigp] IP review of Gujarati LGR proposal v3.5

[Akshat Joshi]

Dear Dr. Sarmad,

I acknowledge the receipt of the IP comments on the Gujarati LGR 
proposal. Will get back soon on this.

Regards,

Akshat

On 22-01-2019 07:49, Sarmad Hussain wrote:
>
> Dear Akshat, NBGP members,
>
> Please find below the review of the Gujarati LGR proposal by the IP 
> members.
>
> Please let us know if you have any queries.  We look forward to your 
> final review.
>
> Regards,
> Sarmad
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> To: Neo-Brahmi Generation Panel
>
> From: Integration Panel
>
> The Integration Panel has reviewed the 20181205 draft of the Gujarati 
> LGR proposal.
>
> Findings:
>
> *DOC*
>
> There were no changes made to the specification for Gujarati, except 
> minor editorial touches in the DOCx file. At this point, there are a 
> few small *editorial issues* for the *DOCx*:
>
> (D1) p. 7 - the same language appears to be spelled Ka*c*chi and 
> Kach*h*i --- the second spelling (in the list) appears in error.
>
> (D2) in the _Webography _item 3
>
>          Wikipedia, “Gujarati language” ---> Gujarati (Unicode block)
>
> *XML*
>
> There are two small *editorial issues* in the *XML*:
>
> (X1)
>
>     permitted as per the [MSR]
>
>     =>
>     permitted as per the [MSR-3]
>
>     The <description> uses [MSR] but defines [MSR-3] as the reference.
>     This is flagged by the IP's HTML converter tool, hence the red
>     color for the letters MSR. (When doing the fix, also remove the
>     definite article which should not be used when a specific version
>     is referenced)
>
> (X2) Like all LGRs at this stage, the following*TBDs *in the 
> <description> need to be replaced by actual values during publication:
>
>     [Proposal]
>
>     NeoBrahmi Generation Panel, "Proposal for a Gujarati Script Root
>     Zone Label Generation Ruleset (LGR)" [Date TBD] [URL TBD]
>
> *TXT*
>
> The IP reviewed the provided test file and finds the expected 
> dispositions.
>
> *Google Doc*
>
> The IP also reviewed the disposition of comments found in
>
> *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from 
> "urldefense.proofpoint.com" claiming to be* 
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1CLKdJBTNDcC_sFFs5s0a_Bk0zQUER2BIruYuyCNgkAw/edit# 
> [docs.google.com] 
> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.google.com_document_d_1CLKdJBTNDcC-5FsFFs5s0a-5FBk0zQUER2BIruYuyCNgkAw_edit-23&d=DwMDaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=KTETvEaGPwPcawI-QmNa-kiv-ZBvdgyyLm-mxd028M4&m=hTZsuB_r-jNLcATOhyeVvjObk4seY8bnSjUmAPHQSqk&s=6RLxJSVPdpry0ewHUu2fpWzqoXHI7_w9d9TOu5R8TP8&e=>
>
> in which the GP notes the conclusion that no further actions are 
> contemplated by the GP and gives a reason for that decision.
>
> Therefore, the IP concludes that all comments appear to have been 
> taken into account. It is assumed by the IP that this document or 
> something substantially similar will be made public as part of the 
> response to Public Comments.
>
> *Conclusion*
>
> The IP requests the GP to address the identified editorial issues 
> before finalizing the submission.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------

-- 
Regards,
Akshat Joshi
C-DAC GIST


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[ C-DAC is on Social-Media too. Kindly follow us at:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CDACINDIA & Twitter: @cdacindia ]

This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the
intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
all copies and the original message. Any unauthorized review, use,
disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email
is strictly prohibited and appropriate legal action will be taken.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/neobrahmigp/attachments/20190122/7f31ae65/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 7789 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/neobrahmigp/attachments/20190122/7f31ae65/signature-0001.jpg>