<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" http-equiv="Content-Type"/>
<style type="text/css">v\:* {}
o\:* {}
w\:* {}
.shape {}
<!-- /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family: "Cambria Math"; }
@font-face {font-family: Calibri; }
@font-face {font-family: Candara; }
/* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {margin: 0in; margin-bottom: .0001pt; font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif; color: black;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink { color: #0563C1; text-decoration: underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed { color: #954F72; text-decoration: underline;}
p.msonormal0, li.msonormal0, div.msonormal0 { margin-right: 0in; margin-left: 0in; font-size: 11.0pt; font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif; color: black;}
span.EmailStyle19 { font-family: "Calibri",sans-serif; color: windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault { font-size: 10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1 { margin: 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1 {}
-->
</style></head><body style="">
<div>
Dear Dr. Sarmad,
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
Please find attached, the Devanagari LGR post the IP feedback and the Variant Analysis.
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
Following files are part of this submission:
</div>
<div>
1. Devanagari LGR Descriptive Document (Doc File)
</div>
<div>
2. Devanagari LGR Descriptive Document (Pdf File)
</div>
<div>
3. Devanagari LGR (XML file)
</div>
<div>
4. Devanagari Test Labels File
</div>
<div>
5. Response to IP file
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
I do acknowledge the detailed Variant Analysis document provided by the IP team. As of now, no specific variants have been added to the DV LGR.
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
In addition, there is a recommendation from IP that one of the Options i.e. Option 4-1 is recommended. However the option recommends "Do nothing". Hence no specific change is incorporated towards that. In case IP actually recommends Option 4-2 and inadvertently mentioned 4-1, DV LGR can accordingly modified soon.
</div>
<div>
</div>
<div>
Regards,
</div>
<div>
Akshat Joshi
</div>
<div>
<br/>On July 2, 2018 at 5:22 AM Sarmad Hussain <sarmad.hussain@icann.org> wrote:
</div>
<div style="position: relative;">
<blockquote style="margin-left: 0px; padding-left: 10px; border-left: solid 1px blue;" type="cite">
<!-- [if !mso]> -->
<!-- <![endif] -->
<!-- [if gte mso 9]> -->
<!-- <![endif] -->
<!-- [if gte mso 9]> -->
<!-- <![endif] -->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p><span style="font-family: 'Candara',sans-serif; color: windowtext;">Dear Akshat and NBGP members,</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'Candara',sans-serif; color: windowtext;">Please find attached the feedback on Devanagari variants</span><span style="font-family: 'Candara',sans-serif;"> </span><span style="font-family: 'Candara',sans-serif; color: windowtext;">(attached) along </span><span style="font-family: 'Candara',sans-serif;">with the "cover letter"</span><span style="font-family: 'Candara',sans-serif; color: windowtext;"> (</span><span style="font-family: 'Candara',sans-serif;">below</span><span style="font-family: 'Candara',sans-serif; color: windowtext;">) from the Integration Panel (IP)</span><span style="font-family: 'Candara',sans-serif;">.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-family: 'Candara',sans-serif; color: windowtext;">Regards,<br/>Sarmad</span></p>
<div style="text-align: center;" align="center" class="MsoNormal">
<hr width="100%" size="2"/>
</div>
<p>To: Neo<span style="color: windowtext;">-</span>Brahmi Generation Panel</p>
<p>The IP has reviewed the variants defined in a number of NeoB LGRs. Some of them required a deeper analysis as it was not obvious whether they would be 'well-behaved' for the purpose of mechanically evaluating the LGR.</p>
<p>A document describing the analysis Devanagari is attached. Note that one of the options, 4-1, has been recommended in our feedback, and that recommendation is unchanged, even if this document treats it as an "option".</p>
<p>For the other options, IP review is still ongoing; we are trying to determine whether implementing these options causes more problems than they would fix and whether there are other ways, such as mechanical testing, to ensure that an LGR is 'well-behaved', which would obviate modifications to the LGR document.</p>
<p>We hope that this document will provide needed background and welcome any questions or discussion.</p>
<p>-IP</p>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br/> _______________________________________________
<br/>Neobrahmigp mailing list
<br/>Neobrahmigp@icann.org
<br/>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/neobrahmigp
</div>
<br />-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
<br />[ C-DAC is on Social-Media too. Kindly follow us at:
<br />Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/CDACINDIA & Twitter: @cdacindia ]
<br />
<br />This e-mail is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
<br />contain confidential and privileged information. If you are not the
<br />intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy
<br />all copies and the original message. Any unauthorized review, use,
<br />disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email
<br />is strictly prohibited and appropriate legal action will be taken.
<br />-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
</body></html>