[Npoc-discuss] One last review before sending our charter to ICANN staff

[Carlos Raul Gutierrez]

Hello Raoul! 

Thanks for your efforts. I understand the importance of a transparent
registration process. And of course, pricing is a key element not only
for the initial registration but also for maintaining the domain over
time. What I don't fully grasp is putting both together with an "and" in
the middle. I don't have an alternative suggestion at the time but can
think of a better structure of what you have already stated: 

<<<We want to encompass all operational concerns, including all 

* technical (Registration, Security, Stability, and Resiliency),  

*legal (Domain Name Fraud, Intellectual Property Abuse, Privacy), 

* and economic (initial Pricing and renewal conditions) 

implications of registering, holding and using TLDs for the stated
purposes of non-profits >>>   

For what it is worth

---
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez 
carlosraul at gutierrez.se 
+506 8837 7176 
Aparatado 1571-1000 
COSTA RICA

El 2019-10-21 08:37, Raoul Plommer escribió:

> Dear members of NPOC, 
> 
> Our new charter is finally at the stage, where we will send it to staff to do their own review. Here it is:  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1HRcUOxtoMUzJnfXhXm-wpJd3vDmVRG9uFTRyojOAbxo/edit?usp=sharing 
> 
> If no new comments have arrived to it by Friday (25.10.), we'll send it off to staff before our F2F meeting in Montreal. 
> 
> The only bit that was changed since the last iteration, was the mission. Here's the new version:
> 
> "1.2 NPOC's mission is to represent Not-for-Profit Organizations by addressing their operational concerns with the generic Top-level Domains (gTLDs). Operational Concerns are defined as issues arising from the use of the gTLDs by the not-for-profit organizations to achieve their own mission. Those can include but are not limited to Domain Name Fraud, Intellectual Property Abuse, Privacy, Security, Stability, and Resiliency, as well as transparent registration process and pricing and continued ownership of domain names." 
> 
> The only change to it from older versions was the highlighted part "process and pricing", as we felt it'd be good to specify what kind of transparency we'd want. Supposedly, without the specification, one could think we'd want the registrants' information to be public. That's not what we want. 
> 
> -Raoul 
> _______________________________________________
> Npoc-discuss mailing list
> Npoc-discuss at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/npoc-discuss
> _______________________________________________
> By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/npoc-discuss/attachments/20191022/9daef2c6/attachment.html>