<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<style type="text/css" style="display:none;"> P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;} </style>
</head>
<body dir="ltr">
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
Dear all,</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
See below - the follow-up to the strategic review discussion (the initial merger issue).</div>
<div>
<div style="font-family: Calibri, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);">
<br>
</div>
<div id="Signature">
<div id="divtagdefaultwrapper" dir="ltr" style="font-size:12pt; color:#000000; background-color:#FFFFFF; font-family:Calibri,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">
<br>
<p style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px;"></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div id="appendonsend"></div>
<hr tabindex="-1" style="display:inline-block; width:98%">
<div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr"><font face="Calibri, sans-serif" color="#000000" style="font-size:11pt"><b>From:</b> NCSG-EC <ncsg-ec-bounces@lists.ncsg.is> on behalf of Raphael Beauregard-Lacroix via NCSG-EC <ncsg-ec@lists.ncsg.is><br>
<b>Sent:</b> Sunday, September 20, 2020 2:06 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> NCSG EC <ncsg-ec@lists.ncsg.is>; Exec. Comm <ncuc-ec@lists.ncuc.org>; Joan Kerr <joankerr@fbsc.org>; Rafik Dammak <rafik.dammak@gmail.com><br>
<b>Subject:</b> [NCSG-EC] Draft Call/ToR for the strategic review</font>
<div> </div>
</div>
<div>
<div dir="ltr">Dear all,
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Please find below the draft ToR for the strategic review </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rb2oN1STQFyKcMc03JOyrULDiGpn2SdBcncL_oQTIz8/edit?usp=sharing">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rb2oN1STQFyKcMc03JOyrULDiGpn2SdBcncL_oQTIz8/edit?usp=sharing</a><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>It is open for comments and suggestions, of course. However given that this is being published on a publicly archived mailing list, I find it more prudent to leave it in comment mode only. Make sure that you can be identified when making suggestions, either
by logging into a google account or signing your comments/edits. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>The main outstanding point is to decide whether to issue the call for a chair first (and as a standalone) or to issue a call for members and then organize the election of a chair from those members. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>There are various ways to look at this, and I do not have a strong commitment to any option, although what came most "naturally" to me was the election of the chair from the members, probably because this is what I have witnessed in policy development.
I have flagged the relevant parts.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Let's give ourselves until Thursday COB UTC in order to hopefully publish the call on Friday.</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Again Joan and Ioana I would kindly ask you to circulate this with the NPOC EC. </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>Have a nice Sunday, </div>
<div><br>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>