[RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership_Staff] [Ext] RE: Plenary call #6 Action Items

Alan Greenberg alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Tue Sep 5 21:57:34 UTC 2017 

See my comments embedded. Alan

At 01/09/2017 09:02 AM, Jean-Baptiste Deroulez wrote:

>Thank you Cathrin, I will update the below action items accordingly.
>
>With regards to “Carlton’s issue”, this is 
>in reference to the response to the GNSO 
>proposal for limited scope and the area of focus 
>“Assess the value and timing of RDAP as a 
>replacement protocol” where Carlton proposed 
>to “assess current protocol for current purposes”.
>
>Kind regards,
>
>Jean-Baptiste
>
>From: "Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu" <Cathrin.BAUER-BULST at ec.europa.eu>
>Date: Friday, September 1, 2017 at 2:14 PM
>To: Jean-Baptiste Deroulez 
><jean-baptiste.deroulez at icann.org>, 
>"rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff at icann.org" 
><rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff at icann.org>
>Subject: [Ext] RE: Plenary call #6 Action Items
>
>Dear Jean-Baptiste,
>
>Many thanks, two quick comments:
>
>On the first bullet: I think for clarity's sake it could be changed to read:
>    * On scope as per the Bylaws section 
> 4.6.e.ii: Review Team agreed to treat separately
>        * the effectiveness of the now current 
> gTLD registry directory service and
>        * whether its implementation meets the 
> legitimate needs of law enforcement, promoting 
> consumer trust and safeguarding registrant data.

Fine.

>The team also agreed that it may be useful to 
>draw on the first WHOIS Review Team Scope of 
>Work discussions for guidance on further 
>defining the criterion of effectiveness.

Fine.

>
>On the "Carlton's issue" bullet: could you make 
>that one a bit clearer? A few days from now 
>everyone will have forgotten what this refers 
>to, and I have to admit I'm already struggling.

I will try.

>
>Thanks
>Cathrin
>
>Cathrin Bauer-Bulst
>Deputy Head of Unit
>Cybercrime
>
>id:image001.png at 01CE198E.B254B7B0
>
>European Commission
>DG Migration and Home Affairs
>Unit D4 - Cybercrime
>
>What we do: 
><https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__ec.europa.eu_dgs_home-2Daffairs_what-2Dwe-2Ddo_policies_organized-2Dcrime-2Dand-2Dhuman-2Dtrafficking_cybercrime_index-5Fen.htm&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=a5VfrQZP4r0Kte2xBJT17IgRyRBHECC3vHSuFP_QBqD22G4dgkHhRZBEhshbjycD&m=ayaurt8U0RUHOAfT93atQzl26cdoav8oBjoaUumChDA&s=7Md6rcPI4-qPrwqsAPtL7lbAOeY37mG3D7I3BAlEdDs&e=>http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies/organized-crime-and-human-trafficking/cybercrime/index_en.htm[ec.europa.eu] 
>
>
>The views expressed in this e-mail are my own and may not be interpreted
>as stating an official position of the European Commission.
>
>From: 
>rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff-bounces at icann.org 
>[mailto:rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff-bounces at icann.org] 
>On Behalf Of Jean-Baptiste Deroulez
>Sent: Friday, September 01, 2017 2:03 PM
>To: rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff at icann.org
>Subject: [RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership_Staff] Plenary call #6 Action Items
>
>Dear Alan, Dear Cathrin,
>
>Can you please confirm the below identified 
>decisions reached and action items can be shared with the review team?
>
>Decisions reached:
>
>·         On scope 4.6.e.ii: Review Team will treat all three separately.
>·         On Scope: On OECD, Review Team will 
>conduct: simple review noting that there are 
>issues and pointing at other groups which have 
>more in-depth on the issue, and may consider 
>recommending that it be dropped or replaced for future reviews.
>·         On scope - Review Team won't be 
>addressing GNSO suggestion "Assess how RDS 
>current & future recommendations might be improved and better coordinated".
>·         On scope - Review will evaluate 
>whether RDAP should be implemented before policy is developed.

(Add: Initial evaluation is that no benefit in implementing now.

>·         On scope - Compliance is within 
>scope, and Review Team will take a look at it deeper.
>·         On scope: Carlton's issue is 
>suitable, a low effort one and will be included 
>in the review, the wording will be refined slightly.

How About: On scope: Carlton's issue on 
suitability of current protocol for current 
purposes: Initial evaluation is that it is not, 
if only that it only supports 7-bit-ASCII.

>·         On scope: IDN: Within Scope, with minimal effort on it.

Add: (This needs more description - IDN in what 
respect?  Do we mean IDN or use of multiple scripts?

>·         On timeline (cf Fact Sheet): 
>agreement to publicize 12-month timeframe.
>
>Action items:
>
>ToR:
>·         On removal/replacement of Team 
>Members, include following edits: new member 
>instead of replacement, 70 % for both thresholds, refuses instead of fails.
>·         On Dependencies section: - add GDPR, 
>- add text "ICANN org to update list and alert 
>RDS-WHOIS2 of any changes to the list"
>
>·         Scope
>·         On Scope: Row 2: Stephanie to provide definition of effectiveness

Stephanie to propose definition of effectiveness.

>
>·         Fact Sheet
>·         Address fact sheet question on how 
>sections percentages are defined.
>
>·         Briefings
>·         Share schedule of briefings - this 
>will inform decision whether to hold Sept 28th meeting or not.
>
>Many thanks in advance
>
>Kind regards,
>
>Jean-Baptiste
>Content-Type: image/png; name="image001.png"
>Content-Description: image001.png
>Content-Disposition: inline; filename="image001.png"; size=6390;
>         creation-date="Fri, 01 Sep 2017 13:02:59 GMT";
>         modification-date="Fri, 01 Sep 2017 13:02:59 GMT"
>Content-ID: <image001.png at 01D32333.652BF440>
>X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
> 
>1;MWHPR03MB2718;27:rgn8Ix6JXjjWcBjnNbkVDhwPXm8wUVu8lyGS8GvqpJQLRFlu7hUD9/50eJPggpm/IoYgtQWgJygI84zFXtzS3TgicncpmwJUGsfnP7Nit+jx5jV+9GOfnTyh1Uj3wxOX
>X-Microsoft-Antispam-Mailbox-Delivery:
> 
>ex:0;auth:0;dest:I;ENG:(400001000128)(400125000095)(20160514016)(750103)(520002050)(400001001223)(400125100095)(61617095)(400001002128)(400125200095);
>
>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
>Content-Disposition: inline
>X-Microsoft-Exchange-Diagnostics:
> 
>1;MWHPR03MB2718;27:rgn8Ix6JXjjWcBjnNbkVDhwPXm8wUVu8lyGS8GvqpJQLRFlu7hUD9/50eJPggpm/IoYgtQWgJygI84zFXtzS3TgicncpmwJUGsfnP7Nit+jx5jV+9GOfnTyh1Uj3wxOX
>X-Microsoft-Antispam-Mailbox-Delivery:
> 
>ex:0;auth:0;dest:I;ENG:(400001000128)(400125000095)(20160514016)(750103)(520002050)(400001001223)(400125100095)(61617095)(400001002128)(400125200095);
>
>_______________________________________________
>RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership_Staff mailing list
>RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership_Staff at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff/attachments/20170905/f71db375/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 184958b9.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 4541 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff/attachments/20170905/f71db375/184958b9.jpg>

More information about the RDS-WHOIS2-RT-Leadership_Staff mailing list