<html>
<body>
I'm afraid I cannot make a decision this moment. The potential problem is
that this would put the RDS session against and RDAP session which likely
has the same audience.<br><br>
I will get hold of my vice-chairs immediately and if they think we can
live with this, we will move there.<br><br>
Sorry I cannot be more definite.<br><br>
Alan<br><br>
<br>
At 27/09/2018 04:34 PM, Tanzanica S. King wrote:<br>
<blockquote type=cite class=cite cite="">Hi, Alan.<br>
<br>
I know it was hard to find a spot for the RDS session to begin with, but
I have this beautiful opening in the main meeting room right after the
welcome ceremony that has just opened up.<br>
<br>
We could bend the rules a little and run the RDS Engagement session from
1000-1100 or 1130 as needed (just following the coffee break from
0930-1000). This would reduce the potential conflict with other sessions
starting at 1030 and allow you to join the ALAC/NCUC outreach session
afterwards.<br>
<br>
Let me know what you think.<br>
<br>
Best,<br>
Tanzanica<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Tanzanica S. King<br>
Sr. Manager, Meeting Strategy and Design <br>
ICANN<br>
<br>
Office +1 310 301 5800<br>
Mobile +1 310 995 3038<br>
<a href="http://www.icann.org/" eudora="autourl">www.icann.org</a><br>
<br>
<b>From: </b>Paul Diaz <pdiaz@pir.org><br>
<b>Date: </b>Thursday , 27 September 2018 at 05:40<br>
<b>To: </b>Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca>, Jean-Baptiste
Deroulez <jean-baptiste.deroulez@icann.org><br>
<b>Cc: </b>Negar Farzinnia <negar.farzinnia@icann.org>, GNSO-secs
<gnso-secs@icann.org>, Tanzanica King
<tanzanica.king@icann.org>, "secretariat@rysg.info"
<secretariat@rysg.info>, RDS-WHOIS2-Leadership
<rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff@icann.org><br>
<b>Subject: </b>RE: FW: [Ext] RE: Engagement Opportunity with the
Registration Directory Services Review Team<br>
<br>
Thanks for this, Alan<br>
<br>
How about this: could the RDS-WHOIS2 session go from 1100-1200 on
Thursday? Unless you really need 90 mins, that would allow ICANN63
participants to attend the beginning of the Innovations session and
decide if they’re really interested or want to be somewhere else.
Thoughts?<br>
<br>
<b>From:</b> Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca> <br>
<b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, September 26, 2018 2:11 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> Jean-Baptiste Deroulez
<jean-baptiste.deroulez@icann.org><br>
<b>Cc:</b> Negar Farzinnia <negar.farzinnia@icann.org>; GNSO-secs
<gnso-secs@icann.org>; Tanzanica S. King
<tanzanica.king@icann.org>; Paul Diaz <pdiaz@pir.org>;
secretariat@rysg.info; RDS-WHOIS2-Leadership
<rds-whois2-rt-leadership_staff@icann.org><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: FW: [Ext] RE: Engagement Opportunity with the
Registration Directory Services Review Team<br>
<b>Importance:</b> High<br>
<br>
It might be more effective if I address all of the original recipients of
Paul's message - my time to handle e-mail during the EPDP meeting is
rather limited. So I am adding Paul, the RySG Secretariat, GNSO-Secs and
Tanzanica as well a RDS-WHOIS2 Leadership.<br><br>
The RDS-WHOIS2-RT Engagement session was initially placed in conflict to
the Welcome Ceremony on Monday morning. That was judged to not be
acceptable. We were then offered a session later that day, in opposition
to an EPDP session. That was problematic at the very least for the two RT
members who are also EPDP members (myself and Stephanie Perrin). That
EDPD session was later designated as a HIT session, but was problematic
before in any case.<br><br>
There did not seem to be a lot of other opportunities and the Ry session
time-slot in question was one that looked viable if not optimal. As far
as I recall, the SO/AC/SG... leaders group agreed that no sessions would
be officially non-conflicted, but that we would schedule them early
enough so that when the rest of the schedule was set, we would know what,
if anything, was in conflict.<br><br>
At this stage in scheduling, moving the session is problematic: others
may now be planning their detailed agenda based on the current schedule,
and it is far from clear that there are other viable options. I agree
that there is a possibility of confusion on the part of ICANN63 attendees
and propose the following to circumvent this.<br><br>
Speaking solely on my own behalf, I would suggest that we make sure that
the Engagement Session description makes it clear that this is NOT a GDPR
or EPDP session, and that at the start of the session we re-iterate this
to allow people who are there due to a misunderstanding can go down the
hall to another session.<br><br>
My two Vice-Chairs are seeing this for the first time and can comment if
they wish, and I will raise the issue with the entire RT (with
representatives from the GNSO/GAC/ALAC/Board) for their
thoughts.<br><br>
Alan<br><br>
At 26/09/2018 10:42 AM, Jean-Baptiste Deroulez wrote:<br><br>
<br>
<dl>
<dd>Dear Alan,<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Please see below the email from Paul Diaz, chair of the gTLD
Registries Stakeholder Group, sharing concerns regarding the schedule of
the RDS-WHOIS2 engagement session at the same time as the âInnovations
in Top Level Domainsâ ses session on 25 Ocotber from 10.30 to
12.00.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Kind regards,<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Jean-Baptiste<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>From: </b>Paul Diaz
<<a href="mailto:pdiaz@pir.org">pdiaz@pir.org</a>><br>
<dd>Date: </b>Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 4:27 PM<br>
<dd>To: </b>Jean-Baptiste Deroulez
<<a href="mailto:jean-baptiste.deroulez@icann.org">
jean-baptiste.deroulez@icann.org</a>>,
"<a href="mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org">gnso-secs@icann.org</a>"
<<a href="mailto:gnso-secs@icann.org">gnso-secs@icann.org</a>>,
"Tanzanica S. King"
<<a href="mailto:tanzanica.king@icann.org">tanzanica.king@icann.org</a>
><br>
<dd>Cc:
</b>"<a href="mailto:secretariat@rysg.info">secretariat@rysg.info</a>
"
<<a href="mailto:secretariat@rysg.info">secretariat@rysg.info</a>
><br>
<dd>Subject: </b>[Ext] RE: Engagement Opportunity with the Registration
Directory Services Review Team<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Hello,<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>When I shared this notice with the RySG, there was an uproar about
the proposed timing. We have been planning under the assumption that the
Master Schedule was effectively âlockedâ and that the
âInnovations in Toin Top Level Domainsâ session (25 October @
1030-11200) would be unconflicted.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>On behalf of the RySG, I ask that the RDS-WHOIS2 engagement session
NOT be scheduled in conflict with the Innovations session on Thursday
morning. We believe thereâs a real risrisk that ICANN63 attendees will
see âWHOISâ157; in the title and mistakenly believe that these
discussions will be GDPR-related. Also, the Innovations session planners
hope that GAC reps and others who have misgivings about new gTLDs will
attend their sessions and come to see how the 2012 round was beneficial
and future rounds should be, too.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Please advise ASAP. I understand that the final Agenda is supposed to
be published on Monday (1 October).<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Best, P<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Paul A. Diaz<br>
</b>
<dd>Chair, gTLD Registries Stakeholder Group (RySG)<br>
<dd>Direct: +1 703.889.5756 | Mobile:+1 703.973.1667 | Skype:
pdiazaim<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd> <br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>From:</b> Jean-Baptiste Deroulez
<<a href="mailto:jean-baptiste.deroulez@icann.org">
jean-baptiste.deroulez@icann.org</a>> <br>
<dd>Sent:</b> Monday, September 24, 2018 5:53 PM<br>
<dd>To:</b> Paul Diaz
<<a href="mailto:pdiaz@pir.org">pdiaz@pir.org</a>><br>
<dd>Cc:</b>
<a href="mailto:secretariat@rysg.info">secretariat@rysg.info</a><br>
<dd>Subject:</b> Engagement Opportunity with the Registration Directory
Services Review Team<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>The below email is sent on behalf of Alan Greenberg, chair of the
Registration Directory Services Review Team.<br>
</i>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Dear Paul,<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Registration Directory Services Review Team (RDS-WHOIS2) published
its Draft Report for public comment on 4 September. Our draft report and
translations of the executive summary (including recommendations) can be
found at
<a href="https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.icann.org_public-2Dcomments_rds-2Dwhois2-2Dreview-2D2018-2D09-2D04-2Den&d=DwMGaQ&c=FmY1u3PJp6wrcrwll3mSVzgfkbPSS6sJms7xcl4I5cM&r=a5VfrQZP4r0Kte2xBJT17IgRyRBHECC3vHSuFP_QBqD22G4dgkHhRZBEhshbjycD&m=OIr69aLTd8YJex7RJ2WqYV1WtvnUW8dXiW6VTskEM40&s=R7sVPhGzOn0eKPhxO4tdsEToDd7fdVbpluJHxyZKgVQ&e=">
https://www.icann.org/public-comments/rds-whois2-review-2018-09-04-en
[icann.org]</a>. The public comment period will close on 4 November
2018.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>An engagement session with the RDS-WHOIS2 Review Team is scheduled
for ICANN63 on 25 October 2018 from 10:30 UTC to 12:00 UTC
(tentative)</i></b>, where participants will have the opportunity to
provide feedback and ask questions directly to the review team on their
draft report and recommendations. <br>
<dd> <br>
<dd> The review team also held a webinar on 17 September
2018</b>, </b>you may listen to the recordings available
<a href="https://community.icann.org/x/ZgmNBQ">here</a>. <br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Community input is key to the success of this process. As such, we
welcome opportunities to hold additional engagement sessions. We realize
that ICANN63 will be a busy meeting but should you have time in your
meeting agenda, we will do our best to have team members attend your
session to deliver an update and collect your teamâs input. If
interested, please send me
<a href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a>
and
<a href="mailto:rds-whois2-staff@icann.org">rds-whois2-staff@icann.org</a>
an email to confirm your availability providing two options.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>I look forward to hearing from you and encourage you to follow our
work via
<a href="https://community.icann.org/x/JIfDAw">
https://community.icann.org/x/JIfDAw</a>.<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Many thanks,<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Best regards,<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd>Alan<br>
<dd> <br>
<dd> <br>
</dl></blockquote></body>
</html>