[RDS-WHOIS2-RT] Compliance subgroups reports

[Carlton Samuels]

If I was sure everybody here have seen the Brit sitcom Yes, [Prime]
Minister I would simply have said Volker's edit was Sir Humphrey to
perfection and leave it at that.

It is this way of making the status quo remain the status quo by use of
language in which a Brit civil servant simply excels.  Read them closely
and you will see those "provided thats" are equivocations that allow the
parties to rest in peace; they simply scream no change here, leave us be.

It is time enough for the WHOIS record to be fish or fowl and not half this
and half that on a technicality. Information assurance demands it, it is
right that all registrants are equally protected and that the data quality
is assured across the board. Oh yes, as it is one DNS, it is entirely
reasonable that all such records face and submit to one and the same
regulatory regime.

If ever I have a hope for the success of the ePDP, it is for the first
time, at last, to deliver a single regulatory regime for WHOIS data.

Let's make up our minds.

-Carlton

==============================
*Carlton A Samuels*

*Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
=============================


On Wed, Aug 15, 2018 at 2:32 PM Susan Kawaguchi <susankpolicy at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> Please see the latest versions of the Compliance subgroup reports.
>
> Lisa adeptly created two reports separating the original recommendation 4
> report from the Topic 6 Compliance report.  Please see those attached.
>
> She also fixed a few typos and revised some of the language for
> readability.  I have reviewed those edits and confirmed that there was no
> change to the meaning or intent of the sentences with these few edits.
>
> Thanks so much Lisa for all the hard work on the reports we couldn't have
> done this without you!
>
> Volker made a few edits to the report discussing grandfathered domain
> names.  He also edited the recommendation on grandfathered domain names.  I
> have added a version with his edits but kept the agreed upon
> recommendation.  We will need to discuss any changes on the next plenary
> call.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Susan
> _______________________________________________
> RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list
> RDS-WHOIS2-RT at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt/attachments/20180815/7e933877/attachment.html>