[RDS-WHOIS2-RT] CALL FOR CONSENSUS: Final Recommendations

[Jean-Baptiste Deroulez]

Dear review team members,

Please also note the updated text on prioritization of recommendations presented on plenary call by Susan:


  *   High priority – These recommendations will create the most impact and the review team found the actions recommended were critical to the WHOIS ecosystem.  The actions required may be complex and could involve in depth analysis and action.  Most involve community input which can be time consuming so the Board may wish to focus on these first.
  *   Medium priority – These recommendations are not quite complex as the high priority but could involve time consuming research and implementation.  Most require actions only by ICANN org so they should be implementable without much community input.
  *   Low priority – some of these recommendations are dependent on other recommendations, call for limited actions or are deferred until other actions have been completed.

Kind regards,

Jean-Baptiste

From: Jean-Baptiste Deroulez <jean-baptiste.deroulez at icann.org>
Date: Monday, February 4, 2019 at 2:30 PM
To: RDS WHOIS2-RT List <rds-whois2-rt at icann.org>
Subject: CALL FOR CONSENSUS: Final Recommendations

Dear review team members,

Following up on the action item identified on today’s plenary call #48<https://community.icann.org/x/Fp4WBg> and Alan’s previous email, review team members are kindly invited to indicate whether you support the attached final recommendations.
Should there be any non-support of a recommendation please explain your objection. Please reply no later than 23:59 UTC on Thursday, 07 February 2019. If you are NOT supporting any recommendation, early notice will be appreciated.
Minority Statements to be sent no later than Wednesday 13 February 2019 - 12:00 UTC

Please note that on today’s call, R5.1 priority level was assigned to High Priority. If you have any comments or concerned, please submit them in reply to this email.

Alan, Lili, Carlton, Susan, Dmitry and Cathrin have confirmed support of all recommendations on plenary call #48<https://community.icann.org/x/Fp4WBg>.

Kind regards,

Jean-Baptiste
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt/attachments/20190204/0c85f17b/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/applefile
Size: 7692 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt/attachments/20190204/0c85f17b/attachment-0001.bin>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Recommendations - Consensus Call.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 346816 bytes
Desc: Recommendations - Consensus Call.pdf
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-rt/attachments/20190204/0c85f17b/Recommendations-ConsensusCall-0001.pdf>