<div dir="ltr">I agree.</div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_attr">On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 8:23 AM SUN Lili <<a href="mailto:L.SUN@interpol.int">L.SUN@interpol.int</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">





<div lang="EN-SG">
<div class="gmail-m_-968676175048860784WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)">I agree. After the 4<sup>th</sup> F2F meeting, it should be reflected as Full Consensus.<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;color:rgb(31,73,125)"><u></u> <u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:11pt;font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"> RDS-WHOIS2-RT [mailto:<a href="mailto:rds-whois2-rt-bounces@icann.org" target="_blank">rds-whois2-rt-bounces@icann.org</a>]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Carlton Samuels<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Saturday, 2 February, 2019 7:45 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> Alan Greenberg <<a href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca" target="_blank">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a>><br>
<b>Cc:</b> RDS WHOIS2-RT List <<a href="mailto:rds-whois2-rt@icann.org" target="_blank">rds-whois2-rt@icann.org</a>><br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: [RDS-WHOIS2-RT] Measurement of Consensus<u></u><u></u></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">It should be repoeted as Full Consensus. Accentuate the positive!<u></u><u></u></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">Carlton<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><u></u> <u></u></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Wed, 30 Jan 2019, 6:02 pm Alan Greenberg <<a href="mailto:alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca" target="_blank">alan.greenberg@mcgill.ca</a> wrote:<u></u><u></u></p>
</div>
<blockquote style="border-top:none;border-right:none;border-bottom:none;border-left:1pt solid rgb(204,204,204);padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 6pt;margin-left:4.8pt;margin-right:0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal">In our draft report, for each recommendation, we reported "Level of
<br>
Consensus" as "No objections".<br>
<br>
Shouldn't that be reported as "Full Consensus"?<br>
<br>
That states it in a positive instead of negative way, and is also <br>
what is specified in our Terms of Reference.<br>
<br>
Alan<br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org" target="_blank">RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt</a><u></u><u></u></p>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</div>

_______________________________________________<br>
RDS-WHOIS2-RT mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org" target="_blank">RDS-WHOIS2-RT@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt" rel="noreferrer" target="_blank">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rds-whois2-rt</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><div><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature">SY, Dmitry Belyavsky</div>