[registration-issues-wg] [CPWG] FW: A conceptual view of TempSpec/EPDP and the Unified Access Model

Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi Hadia at tra.gov.eg
Wed Oct 31 00:39:47 UTC 2018

Thank you Jonathan for sharing this. I should note though that a lot of the stuff in there is very contentious and agreement on it is very difficult. Looking forward to tomorrows CPWG call.

From: CPWG <cpwg-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Jonathan Zuck <JZuck at innovatorsnetwork.org>
Sent: 31 October 2018 00:44
To: cpwg at icann.org
Cc: ICANN At-Large Staff
Subject: [CPWG] FW: A conceptual view of TempSpec/EPDP and the Unified  Access Model

I've invited Steve to come on the call tomorrow to discuss this diagram but I wanted to circulate it beforehand.

On 10/30/18, 5:46 PM, "Steve DelBianco" <sdelbianco at netchoice.org> wrote:


    Could you please think about sharing this with ALAC policy folks who are working on the EPDP?

    Attached please find a conceptual view of EPDP and the Unified Access Model.

    This started with a napkin sketch while Keith Drazek and I were talking at the Barcelona airport on Friday morning, as a follow-up to the very positive CSG-CPH meeting on Wednesday.

    We saw the need to help the ICANN community distinguish between Published data, Disclosure under “reasonable access”, and Unified Access operated by ICANN.  This diagram attempts to make those distinctions.

    Another purpose of the diagram is to focus the EPDP (at this stage) on collection, publication, and discretionary disclosure under (what the TempSpec calls “reasonable access”).  With that focus, the EPDP can move more smoothly to an initial report on its first charter task to develop policy to replace the TempSpec.

    We understand that phase 2 of EPDP can address policy for the UAM, including accreditation process, verifying credentials, logging, and disclosure.  But first, the community and Data Protection Authorities need to endorse the conceptual approach that a UAM operated by ICANN can position ICANN as the responsible party.  That's a "gating question".

    --Steve DelBianco

CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org

More information about the registration-issues-wg mailing list