[registration-issues-wg] [CPWG] [GTLD-WG] EPDP: Geographic distinction
JZuck at innovatorsnetwork.org
Tue Oct 30 03:12:25 UTC 2018
I'm inclined to say restricted if for no other reason than we'll eventually have a bunch of GDPRs that are slightly different.
On 10/29/18, 9:36 PM, "GTLD-WG on behalf of Alan Greenberg" <gtld-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org on behalf of alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
GDPR is applicable to residents of the EU by companies resident there
One of the issues is whether contracted parties should be allowed or
required to distinguish between those who are resident there and elsewhere.
There is agreement that such distinction should be allowed, but EPDP
is divided on whether it should be required. The GAC/BC/IPC want to
see the distinction made, and at least one very large contracted
party does already make the distinction. Other contracted parties are
pushing back VERY strongly saying that there is virtually no way that
the can or are willing to make the distinction.
The current (confusing) state of the working document is attached.
Which side should ALAC come down on?
- Restrict application to those to whom GDPR applies?
- Apply universally ignoring residence?
As usual, quick replies requested.
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org
More information about the registration-issues-wg