[registration-issues-wg] [CPWG] EPDP: Geographic distinction

Vanda Etges vanda at etges.com.br
Tue Oct 30 11:21:39 UTC 2018


Considering several countries like in Latin America for instance are approving one by one its own law GDPR compliant I would bet on the universal , ignoring distinction related to place since in few years they will need to extend to all clients 

Vanda Scartezini
Sent from my iPhone
Sorry for typos 

> On 30 Oct 2018, at 08:06, Tijani BEN JEMAA <tijani.benjemaa at topnet.tn> wrote:
> 
> Alan, 
> I do understand the contracted parties who push back for at least 2 reasons:
> the mobility of registrants
> the complexity of managing 2 kind of treatment  
> 
> I though it was said in the beginning that the contracted parties should remain free to apply universally or only for the European subjects. This is in my opinion the best choice.
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Tijani BEN JEMAA
> Executive Director
> Mediterranean Federation of Internet Associations (FMAI)
> Phone: +216 98 330 114
>             +216 52 385 114
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  
>> Le 30 oct. 2018 à 02:32, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> a écrit :
>> 
>> GDPR is applicable to residents of the EU by companies resident there 
>> and worldwide.
>> 
>> One of the issues is whether contracted parties should be allowed or 
>> required to distinguish between those who are resident there and elsewhere.
>> 
>> There is agreement that such distinction should be allowed, but EPDP 
>> is divided on whether it should be required. The GAC/BC/IPC want to 
>> see the distinction made, and at least one very large contracted 
>> party does already make the distinction. Other contracted parties are 
>> pushing back VERY strongly saying that there is virtually no way that 
>> the can or are willing to make the distinction.
>> 
>> The current (confusing) state of the working document is attached.
>> 
>> Which side should ALAC come down on?
>> 
>> - Restrict application to those to whom GDPR applies?
>> - Apply universally ignoring residence?
>> 
>> As usual, quick replies requested.
>> 
>> Alan<RySG revisions Small Team #2 Geographic - updated.pdf>_______________________________________________
>> CPWG mailing list
>> CPWG at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
> _______________________________________________
> registration-issues-wg mailing list
> registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/registration-issues-wg/attachments/20181030/3838dedb/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg


More information about the registration-issues-wg mailing list