[registration-issues-wg] [CPWG] [GTLD-WG] Next possible move related to GDPR

Carlton Samuels carlton.samuels at gmail.com
Mon Sep 3 22:19:14 UTC 2018


+1

In this case we as end users advocates are morally bound to prioritize the
interests of the majority. As best as we can discern them.

Carlton

On Mon, 3 Sep 2018, 4:52 pm Evan Leibovitch, <evanleibovitch at gmail.com>
wrote:

>
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018, 3:38 PM Alan Greenberg, <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> Let us hypothesize that there are 4 billion users and 2% of them are
>> gTLD registrants (80,000,000). Does that mean that Hadia and I should
>> push strongly for law enforcement and cybersecurity professionals to
>> have good access most of the time, but for 2% of the time we strongly
>> support those who want to minimize their access because they do not
>> believe that there is sufficient justification to infringe on
>> registrant privacy (ie the "privacy fetishists  ;-) )?
>>
>
> If that is the split, 98 to 2... Given what I originally said, that
> clearly falls under "rough consensus", if the determination is clear on
> what the non-registrant end user PoV is.
>
> Consensus does not demand unanimity. Never did. But that balance is pretty
> overwhelming.
>
> That will not give us much credibility!
>>
>
> I disagree. Credibility is based on honesty and sincerity, not dogmatism.
> The expectation that the global end user community speaks with a monolithic
> single viewpoint is what isn't credible.
>
> Cheers,
> Evan
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/registration-issues-wg/attachments/20180903/fbe0bcf6/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg


More information about the registration-issues-wg mailing list