[registration-issues-wg] [CPWG] [GTLD-WG] Next possible move related to GDPR

Alan Greenberg alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca
Tue Sep 4 16:38:14 UTC 2018

Thananswer is both yes an no.

First, you should remove the "complies with GDPR" 
part. That is a given it is not an option. 
Period. But exactly WHAT will be deemed to comply 
with GDPR is the real question. And that is what 
the discussion is really about.

*I* want to make information that will be useful 
to cybersecurity folks and those who create 
reputation serves and spam filters as easy for 
them to access as possible. Other want to erect 
high and difficult barriers. Those barriers may 
come in the form of the detailed rational for 
every bit of information, or whether the process is automated or manual.

"consumer protection" is a public good issue that 
is a given. But HOW it is achieved is the difficult part.


At 04/09/2018 11:51 AM, Olivier MJ Crépin-Leblond wrote:

>So we are somehow in the middle. The question we 
>should be asking ourselves, is whether there is 
>a solution that satisfies both sides of the 
>debate? A solution that provides consumer 
>protection, whilst at the same time complies with GDPR?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/registration-issues-wg/attachments/20180904/a4b9ac2c/attachment.html>
-------------- next part --------------
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org

More information about the registration-issues-wg mailing list