[registration-issues-wg] [CPWG] DRAFT ALAC EPDP Advice

Seun Ojedeji seun.ojedeji at gmail.com
Thu Apr 4 18:39:47 UTC 2019

Hello Carlton,

I hear you loud and clear, but if we are being realistic, I think the level
of representation that exist within the ePDP may be a factor on how far one
can push these things. I have heard a couple of times that the numbers
don't matter but how loud we  "constructively" scream, well within ICANN,
that's probably nothing more than a good motivational speech.

Attempts has been made to get this through via the ePDP without luck and
since ALAC practically has a milk teeth on ePDP, I don't think it will be
out of order to utilize that which we've always been reminded of as being
our role, which is to advice; hopefully there are still some permanent
teeth left in there.

Sent from my mobile
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On Thu, 4 Apr 2019, 17:54 Carlton Samuels, <carlton.samuels at gmail.com>

> Thick WHOIS made sense back then - and some of us were savaged for taking
> that position! - and still does today, if only because if every GTLD
> operator has the same obligations it is easier to check compliance.
> The distinction between legal and natural persons and why that would
> matter is, um, well, I am loathe to commit 2 more brain cells to that
> argument.
> The wave and momentum of national data privacy law and regulations is
> tacking the EU way. So in the final analysis a geographic distinction has
> no long term value.
> Do we have a new solution to offer anywhere?
> And why does this 'advise the Board request/require' sound so much like we
> got popped in the mouth in the schoolyard and ran to teacher for justice?
> A better posture is to make the arguments we favour sharper and put them
> on the wire for the WG to see.
> Orchestrate and manufacture consent!
> Carlton.
> On Wed, 3 Apr 2019, 8:59 am Alan Greenberg, <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
> wrote:
>> Please find attached a draft of the ALAC Advice to the Board related to
>> the EPDP.
>> Note that the highlighting (inadvertantly missing in the third case)
>> gives two alternative pheasings to be discussed.
>> Hadia has reviewed it and supports it.
>> Alan
>> --
>> Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos.
>> _______________________________________________
>> CPWG mailing list
>> CPWG at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
>> _______________________________________________
>> registration-issues-wg mailing list
>> registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/registration-issues-wg
> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/registration-issues-wg/attachments/20190404/eec3a678/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org

More information about the registration-issues-wg mailing list