[registration-issues-wg] [CPWG] [GTLD-WG] Further Revised Draft Statement on .ORG Renewal

Jonathan Zuck JZuck at innovatorsnetwork.org
Tue Apr 30 13:23:25 UTC 2019


Of course, that's exactly what the CCT Review was asked to do. I've been referring to it. There's nothing else to study at this point, only to try.

Jonathan Zuck
Executive Director
Innovators Network Foundation
www.Innovatorsnetwork.org<http://www.Innovatorsnetwork.org>

________________________________
From: GTLD-WG <gtld-wg-bounces at atlarge-lists.icann.org> on behalf of Marita Moll <mmoll at ca.inter.net>
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2019 8:48:56 AM
To: Judith Hellerstein; Greg Shatan
Cc: CPWG
Subject: Re: [GTLD-WG] [CPWG] Further Revised Draft Statement on .ORG Renewal


Thanks Judith. 4 people already on record asking for the economic study before the lifting of price caps. Anyone else?

And thanks Greg for handling what has become a pretty controversial comment

Marita

On 4/30/2019 2:44 PM, Judith Hellerstein wrote:
Hi Greg
I very much like the new and improved statement. I agree with you about UA but perhaps we can include it somehow in the statement.

I also agree with Marita and Justine that  we should ask fur the economic study first and only upon the study’s results decide whether to keep price caps or not to give potential and existing registrants time/leeway to plan for/react to an eventual price cap removal.

Thanks for this revised draft. Since we are not meeting today but Thursday how will we be able to adopt this proposal.

Best
Judith

Sent from my iPhone
Judith at jhellerstein.com<mailto:Judith at jhellerstein.com>
Skype ID:Judithhellerstein

On Apr 30, 2019, at 2:14 AM, Greg Shatan <greg at isoc-ny.org<mailto:greg at isoc-ny.org>> wrote:

All,

I am attaching another, further revised draft public comment on the .ORG renewal, after sifting through the various recent conversations on the list.   I will try to circulate a redline in the morning, New York time, but can't right now.

I thought about including something on UA, but for .ORG and in the absence of proposed language, I did not see the obvious hook in this statement to bring that concept in.

Best regards,

Greg

Greg Shatan
greg at isoc-ny.org<mailto:greg at isoc-ny.org>
President, ISOC-NY
"The Internet is for everyone"
<#4244345-v3-Draft ALAC Statement on the Proposed Renewal of the ORG Registry Agreement.DOCX>
_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org<mailto:CPWG at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg



_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org<mailto:CPWG at icann.org>
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/registration-issues-wg/attachments/20190430/68278587/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
_______________________________________________
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg


More information about the registration-issues-wg mailing list