[registration-issues-wg] [CPWG] [ALAC] Fwd: [Gnso-epdp-team] BC Consensus Call Responses

Justine Chew justine.chew at gmail.com
Mon Feb 18 03:46:53 UTC 2019


At this juncture, since a 'majority' of CPWG (and ALAC?) has opted to
support the ALAC Statement that was submitted, I would venture that any
effort to clarify or explicitly lends to ALAC's mandate ... consumer
protection, trust, cybersecurity etc ... should be supported.

Further, I see no inconsistency between the ALAC submitted statement and
the amendments submitted by IPC/BC to the EPDP Team Final Report and remain
guided by you and Hadia as to the actual details which were discussed by
the EPDP and agreed or not agreed vs included in or omitted from the Final
Report for whatever reason -- your reply to the "one negative message"

** I noted that IPC/BC did not hesitate to say they "cannot support" the
Final Report without the 5 amendments being made --- it will be interesting
to monitor how these amendments will be dealt with by the EPDP.*

*In short, yes, I fully and strongly support IPC/BC's suggested amendments.*

Justine Chew

On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 10:41, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>

> Thanks Cheryl. If others agree, please speak up QUICKLY. If Internet speed
> was fast, EPDP speed is even faster and we already have one negative
> message -
> https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-epdp-team/2019-February/001692.html.
> Alan
> --
> Sent from my mobile. Please excuse brevity and typos.
> On February 17, 2019 8:47:36 PM EST, Cheryl Langdon-Orr <
> langdonorr at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Alan and Hadia,
>> Thank you for passing this on, from my purely personal perspective, the
>> IPC/BC proposed text amendments to the Final Draft of the EPDP Phase 1
>> Report, is that they are indeed, as indicated by you Alan, well worthy of
>> receiving ALAC/At-Large support.
>> Firstly, they are it seems to me, in keeping with a few concerns and
>> considerations on some matters raised in your discussions with the CPWG,
>> and also reflecting the views and preferences articulated by the majority
>> of active participants in the WG.
>> They also, in my view, act as enhancements and improvements to the
>> existing Draft Final Text, in the manner in which they seek to ensure
>> greater specificity and clarity about the purpose and expectations of the
>> following Phase 2 work of the EPDP Team, in addition to providing valuable
>> timeline information and guidance to the key actors/stakeholders engaged in
>> and affected by GDPR, in the near and medium term and provide both greater
>> surety and predictability to the Full Consensus outcomes of that work.
>> I would, therefore, encourage the ALAC and the rest of the CPWG /
>> At-Large Community to support your endorsement of this proposed text as
>> 'friendly amendments' (more than actually) to the Final Report...
>> <https://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>
>> Cheryl Langdon-Orr
>> about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr
>> <https://about.me/cheryl.LangdonOrr?promo=email_sig&utm_source=product&utm_medium=email_sig&utm_campaign=gmail_api&utm_content=thumb>
>> On Mon, 18 Feb 2019 at 10:45, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>
>> wrote:
>>> I think it is safe to say that we fully and strongly support these
>>> suggested changes. Any disagreement?
>>> Alan
>>> From: Margie Milam <margiemilam at fb.com>
>>> To: "gnso-epdp-team at icann.org" <gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>
>>> Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2019 17:28:44 +0000
>>> Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] BC Consensus Call Responses
>>> Dear Colleagues-
>>> The BC and IPC members have been working hard over the weekend to
>>> develop our response to the consensus call and GNSO Council voting on the Final
>>> Report for EPDP Phase 1
>>> <https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__community.icann.org_display_EOTSFGRD_g.-2BDraft-2BFinal-2BReport-3Fpreview-3D_102145109_104237485_EPDP-2520Team-2520Draft-2520Final-2520Report-2520-2D-2520Redline-2520-2D-2520version-252016-2520February-25202019.pdf&d=DwMGaQ&c=5VD0RTtNlTh3ycd41b3MUw&r=_4XWSt8rUHZPiRG6CoP4Fnk_CCk4p550lffeMi3E1z8&m=JeJV68_XA0ovurRrcT2fYYDnJIRHwZ_8MSTwyFhaG1A&s=8u2KQZGE49aFP7yFTnfWTiuyyqvJR8V9PDy5tnqBRJU&e=>.
>>> The attached response is just 3 pages long, and reflects close
>>> collaboration with the IPC, listing five minor amendments to the Final
>>> Report in order to obtain BC and IPC support.
>>> We hope to discuss these items with you this week.
>>> All the best,
>>> Margie Milam and Mark Svancarek
>>> BC Representatives on the EPDP
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Gnso-epdp-team mailing list
>>> Gnso-epdp-team at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/gnso-epdp-team
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ALAC mailing list
>>> ALAC at atlarge-lists.icann.org
>>> https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/alac
>>> At-Large Online: http://www.atlarge.icann.org
>>> ALAC Working Wiki:
>>> https://community.icann.org/display/atlarge/At-Large+Advisory+Committee+(ALAC)
>> _______________________________________________
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/cpwg
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/registration-issues-wg/attachments/20190218/5459486a/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org

More information about the registration-issues-wg mailing list