[registration-issues-wg] [CPWG] [Gnso-epdp-team] GAC statement to phase 1 final report
Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi
Hadia at tra.gov.eg
Wed Feb 20 10:53:00 UTC 2019
Seun I don't agree with that, it is a misunderstanding from the GAC side. Where does it ever say in the report that the organization field is optional for the registrars to provide all what the report talks about is the phase in period and the publication and consent. Unlike the tech contact field which is optional for the registrars to provide
From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
Sent: 20 February 2019 12:52
To: Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi
Cc: Alan Greenberg; CPWG
Subject: Re: [CPWG] [Gnso-epdp-team] GAC statement to phase 1 final report
I think it's a matter of semantics, the first paragraph of the GAC statement under recommendation 5,7 where "...making collections optional for registrars...." was mentioned refers to the technical contacts. It is the second paragraph that refers to the organisation contact which was also rightly also stated.
>From my read, I don't think there is a misunderstanding in the interpretation of the report as reflected in the GAC statement.
Sent from my mobile
Kindly excuse brevity and typos
On Wed, 20 Feb 2019, 11:21 Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi <Hadia at tra.gov.eg<mailto:Hadia at tra.gov.eg> wrote:
One comment the organization field is optional for the registrant but required for the registrar to offer, unlike the tech contact field
From: CPWG <cpwg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cpwg-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>>
Sent: 20 February 2019 08:44
Subject: [CPWG] Fwd: [Gnso-epdp-team] GAC statement to phase 1 final report
Those following the EPDP will find this interesting.
>From: "Heineman, Ashley" <AHeineman at ntia.doc.gov<mailto:AHeineman at ntia.doc.gov>>
>To: GNSO EPDP <gnso-epdp-team at icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>>
>Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:54:20 +0000
>Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] GAC statement to phase 1 final report
>Please find attached a statement for including in the phase 1 final
>report from the GAC small group. FWIW - this does NOT represent an
>objection to the consensus calls or the report itself.
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org<mailto:CPWG at icann.org>
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org
More information about the registration-issues-wg