[registration-issues-wg] [CPWG] [Gnso-epdp-team] GAC statement to phase 1 final report

Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi Hadia at tra.gov.eg
Wed Feb 20 11:06:58 UTC 2019

Page 7 - footnote says  "for those data elements marked as "optional" these are optional for the RNH to provide

The Technical contact is addressed separately on page 8 where it says that it is optional for the registrar to provide

that is the organization field is required to be offered by the registrars the problem with the recommendation is the phase in period that has no certain date


From: Seun Ojedeji <seun.ojedeji at gmail.com>
Sent: 20 February 2019 12:52
To: Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi
Cc: Alan Greenberg; CPWG
Subject: Re: [CPWG] [Gnso-epdp-team] GAC statement to phase 1 final report

Hello Haidia,

I think it's a matter of semantics, the first paragraph of the GAC statement under recommendation 5,7 where "...making collections optional for registrars...." was mentioned refers to the technical contacts. It is the second paragraph that refers to the organisation contact which was also rightly also stated.

>From my read, I don't think there is a misunderstanding in the interpretation of the report as reflected in the GAC statement.


Sent from my mobile
Kindly excuse brevity and typos

On Wed, 20 Feb 2019, 11:21 Hadia Abdelsalam Mokhtar EL miniawi <Hadia at tra.gov.eg<mailto:Hadia at tra.gov.eg> wrote:
One comment the organization field is optional for the registrant but required for the registrar to offer, unlike the tech contact field

From: CPWG <cpwg-bounces at icann.org<mailto:cpwg-bounces at icann.org>> on behalf of Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca<mailto:alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca>>
Sent: 20 February 2019 08:44
Subject: [CPWG] Fwd: [Gnso-epdp-team] GAC statement to phase 1 final report

Those following the EPDP will find this interesting.


>From: "Heineman, Ashley" <AHeineman at ntia.doc.gov<mailto:AHeineman at ntia.doc.gov>>
>To: GNSO EPDP <gnso-epdp-team at icann.org<mailto:gnso-epdp-team at icann.org>>
>Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:54:20 +0000
>Subject: [Gnso-epdp-team] GAC statement to phase 1 final report
>Dear Kurt,
>Please find attached a statement for including in the phase 1 final
>report from the GAC small group.  FWIW - this does NOT represent an
>objection to the consensus calls or the report itself.
>Thanks kindly,
>Ashley Heineman
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org<mailto:CPWG at icann.org>
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org

More information about the registration-issues-wg mailing list