[registration-issues-wg] [CPWG] EPDP Answer omissions?
h.raiche at internode.on.net
Sun Jan 6 20:46:30 UTC 2019
When I read the questions, I was very unsure as to what I would thing, but more importantly, if it is an issue for users.
This confirms my thoughts so thanks for the explanation
> On Jan 7, 2019, at 6:51 AM, Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg at mcgill.ca> wrote:
> There have been questions asked as to why we omitted replying to
> certain questions in the EPDP response (in particular Recs 13, 14 and 21).
> This was not an error, but intentional. The Recs were in relation to
> Data Processing roles and responsibilities, the classification of who
> is the "controller" under GDPR, and what formal agreements need to be
> in place between the various contracted parties and ICANN. The answer
> is that we did not think that these issues had specific relevancy to
> Individual users nor did we have the legal expertise to contribute
> strong arguments.
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> registration-issues-wg mailing list
> registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org
More information about the registration-issues-wg