[registration-issues-wg] [CPWG] Message to CPWG from Joanna Kulesza, Co-Chair of CBWG
carlton.samuels at gmail.com
Wed Jan 30 17:18:00 UTC 2019
I would not recommend Greg's -1 and 0 for valuable f2f time.
Maybe if the objective is to reach a wandering itinerant lot of locals at
Kobe, then yes. Here's the thing though. That kind is not ordinarily
attracted to policy work, it being the ultimate objective here.
In my view the f2f must be reserved for activities that hard sell the WG
concept and the active WGs.
I can speak authoritatively for the folks who participate from the
Caribbean specifically and maybe, with an outward reach, the Global South.
They tend to be, by education and practicum, already hip to the baseline;
take a quick scan of the typical profile. In fact, it makes sense to
accept that their very presence in the conversation signal this baseline
knowledge. Suggest you provide virtuals for those who might need a
*Carlton A Samuels*
*Mobile: 876-818-1799Strategy, Process, Governance, Assessment & Turnaround*
On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 11:10 PM Greg Shatan <greg at isoc-ny.org> wrote:
> I would break this down to a few separate (but interrelated) streams:
> -1. What is ICANN and why does it exist?
> 0. The "geography" of ICANN (what's what, who's who, who's where)
> 1. How policy development works in ICANN
> 2. Becoming an effective participant in ICANN policy development (and all
> the different ways you can contribute)
> 3. The big issues from the beginning until now
> 4. The hot topics from now into the future
> 5. Ongoing PDPs and implementation efforts
> The tendency is to jump in around #4, which is kind of where Joanna's list
> sits. But that's hard without a foundation. -1 and 0 are necessary in the
> big picture, you could get away with starting with 1 and 2, which are
> really about the process, but not the substance of policymaking. At that
> point 3, 4 and 5 look very different. Instead of being spectators and
> considering this a policy briefing like you might get from Diplo, etc., the
> audience sees that they are (or could be and should be) participants. And
> that this -- above all (in my opinion) -- is the reason to be at ICANN in
> the first place.
> Just my 2 cents....
> Greg Shatan
> greg at isoc-ny.org
> President, ISOC-NY
> *"The Internet is for everyone"*
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019 at 8:37 AM Nadira Alaraj <nadira.araj at gmail.com>
>> Dear Joanna and all,
>> Thank you very much for the proposal of a face to face meeting on policy
>> engagement in Kobe.
>> Which could be as a pilot program to another course to be conducted at
>> ATLAS III.
>> Targetting potential leaders to attend ATLAS III to discuss several
>> sessions on policies that they have minimal engagement or minimal
>> understanding might counteract the objective of empowering those
>> Would be good to discuss your proposal at the ATLAS III meeting this
>> Best wishes
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2019, 14:27 ICANN At-Large Staff <staff at atlarge.icann.org
>>> Dear All,
>>> On behalf of Joanna Kulesza, co-chair of the Capacity Building Working
>>> Group (CBWG), please see below forwarded message.
>>> ICANN Policy Staff in support of the At-Large Community
>>> Website: atlarge.icann.org
>>> Facebook: facebook.com/icann <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>
>>> atlarge <https://www.facebook.com/icannatlarge>
>>> Twitter: @ <https://twitter.com/ICANNAtLarge>ICANNAtLarge
>>> * * *
>>> Dear CPWG members,
>>> as promised during our last call, here I am with a kind request for your
>>> consideration: as the newly appointed co-chair of the Capacity Building
>>> group (together with Alfredo Calderon) I would like to ask you to consider
>>> holding a policy development workshop for our members in Kobe.
>>> We thought it might be helpful to get our members introduced to the
>>> specifics of policy development: how it works, what it means, how to get
>>> involved. This session could also include an insight into current At-Large
>>> policy priorities. To give you an idea of what might be considered, the
>>> specific themes mentioned in the current CB draft strategy include: 1)
>>> balancing privacy and security; 2) jurisdiction (building upon the work of
>>> the CCWG-Accountability Work Stream; 3) changing business models that
>>> impact IG processes (including but not limited to new gTLDs); 4) safe use
>>> of social networks or secure internet; 5) accessibility (in the narrow
>>> sense directly linked to the core values) and, potentially, 6) algorithms,
>>> AI, fake news and contractual compliance (if can be linked to the core
>>> The session could focus on those broad themes important to users or
>>> directly on policy consultations that are/will be currently open to guide
>>> the participants directly into the practicalities of policy work.
>>> Looking forward to hearing your thoughts here on the list or during the
>>> next call.
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Joanna Kulesza
>>> CPWG mailing list
>>> CPWG at icann.org
>> CPWG mailing list
>> CPWG at icann.org
>> registration-issues-wg mailing list
>> registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> CPWG mailing list
> CPWG at icann.org
> registration-issues-wg mailing list
> registration-issues-wg at atlarge-lists.icann.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
-------------- next part --------------
CPWG mailing list
CPWG at icann.org
More information about the registration-issues-wg