[rssac-caucus] 48 HOUR LAST CALL: DRAFT Final Report on Root zone TTLs

[Warren Kumari]

On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 1:19 PM, Steve Sheng <steve.sheng at icann.org> wrote:
> Thanks Warren.
>
> This report is on the agenda for the 3 September 2015 teleconference.

Cool thanks.

This somewhat feels like a black hole -- the Caucus WG works on a
document for a long time, and polishes it nicely, then it disappears
into the "real" RSSAC and we wait, hoping to hear something at some
unspecified time in the future...

W



>
> Steve
>
> On 8/27/15, 12:55 PM, "Warren Kumari" <warren at kumari.net> wrote:
>
>>I'm checking in to see what the status is here... Was this shipped
>>over to RRSAC? When do we hear back? etc.
>>
>>
>>
>>W
>>
>>On Thu, Jul 23, 2015 at 11:05 AM, Steve Sheng <steve.sheng at icann.org>
>>wrote:
>>> Dear RSSAC Caucus,
>>>
>>>   Given that there are no further comments on this document. The report
>>>on
>>> Root Zone TTLs is finalized.  The document will be copy-edited and sent
>>>to
>>> RSSAC for formal action.
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Steve
>>>
>>> From: <rssac-caucus-bounces at icann.org> on behalf of Steve Sheng
>>> <steve.sheng at icann.org>
>>> Date: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 at 6:00 PM
>>> To: "rssac-caucus at icann.org" <rssac-caucus at icann.org>
>>> Subject: [rssac-caucus] 48 HOUR LAST CALL: DRAFT Final Report on Root
>>>zone
>>> TTLs
>>>
>>> Dear RSSAC caucus,
>>>
>>>   Thank you again for your feedback on the TTL document. The Caucus work
>>> working group (along with a few caucus members) met at IETF 93 today and
>>> finalized the document.
>>>
>>>   In the attached final document, a few changes are made:
>>>
>>>    1) recommendations are updated based on the additional feedback and
>>>work
>>> party discussions. The rationale is documented at the end of section
>>>6.4.4.
>>>
>>>    2) added text to indicate that this is not an urgent problem to be
>>>fixed,
>>> and that the issue to be addressed within a
>>>
>>> reasonable amount of time following an update of the necessary
>>>procedures
>>> documents and software testing.
>>>
>>>
>>>    3) additional text to indicate that a new RRSIG record covering the
>>> DNSKEY RRset appears in the root zone every ten days, except at the end
>>>of
>>> calendar quarters where the interval may be extended to 12 days.
>>>
>>>   4) light-editing through the document (e.g. make recommendations in
>>>the
>>> executive summary consistent with the recommendations section, etc.)
>>>
>>>    5) updated acknowledgement section.
>>>
>>>   With this, this document is put to the 48 hour last call for comments
>>> period. Please provide your comments by close of business Thursday, 23
>>>July
>>> 2015. Following the last call, the documents will be copy-edited and
>>>sent to
>>> RSSAC for formal action.
>>>
>>>
>>> Best,
>>> Steve
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> rssac-caucus mailing list
>>> rssac-caucus at icann.org
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rssac-caucus
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
>>idea in the first place.
>>This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
>>regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
>>of pants.
>>   ---maf



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf