[rssac-caucus] FOR REVIEW: DRAFT RSSAC002 Version 2

[Ondřej Surý]

Hi all,

I probably missed the deadline, but I read the document and the only thing caught my attention was section 2.5 -> I would move the text from 4.5 (or add short note) about extended RCODEs to 2.5.

Cheers,
Ondrej

--
 Ondřej Surý -- Technical Fellow
 --------------------------------------------
 CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.    --     Laboratoře CZ.NIC
 Milesovska 5, 130 00 Praha 3, Czech Republic
 mailto:ondrej.sury at nic.cz    https://nic.cz/
 --------------------------------------------

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Steve Sheng" <steve.sheng at icann.org>
> To: rssac-caucus at icann.org
> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2015 9:04:30 PM
> Subject: [rssac-caucus] FOR REVIEW: DRAFT RSSAC002 Version 2

> Dear RSSAC Caucus,
> 
> Attached please find RSSAC002 version 2 for your review. In this version, we
> made the following changes based on the RSSAC caucus discussions led by Duane:
> 
> 
>    * Section 2.2 (The size of the overall root zone) was amended to clarify that
>    TCP size prefix octets are not included in the metric.
>    * Section 2.4 (The query and response size distribution) was amended to clarify
>    that TCP size prefix octets are not included in these metrics.
>    * Section 2.4 was amended to include 0-15 in size ranges to be tabulated.
>    * Superfluous quotes around YAML keys were removed from example YAML in sections
>    4.1 (The ‘load-time’ Metric) and 4.2 (The ‘zone-size’ Metric).
>    * Indentation was fixed for example YAML in sections 4.3 (The ‘traffic-volume’
>    Metric) and 4.6 (The ‘unique-sources’ Metric).
>    * Section 4.5 (The ‘rcode-volume’ Metric) was amended to clarify that nonzero
>    counts should be omitted.
> 
> In addition, we made the following organizational changes:
> 
> 
>    * Make this document RSSAC002 version 2
>    * Added a Revision History section (see section 7).
> 
> Attached please find the redline, clean word and PDF version. Since the proposed
> revisions have already been discussed and agreed on the caucus list, we will
> give this update a 7 day additional review period. Please provide your
> feedback, if any, no later than 23 November 2015. After that, this document
> will be sent to RSSAC for formal action.
> 
> Best,
> Steve
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rssac-caucus mailing list
> rssac-caucus at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rssac-caucus