[rssac-caucus] [Non-DoD Source] FOR REVIEW: DRAFT RSSAC002 Version 2

[Steve Sheng]

Hi Howard, 

  Thank you for these comments. Based on the ensuing mailing list discussion. The following changes were made to the document:  

Section 4.1, second paragraph, "The latency in the distribution system" changed to "Latency in publishing available data".

Section 2.1, second paragraph - "may present as anomalies in measurements",
changed to "may be present as anomalies in measurements”. 

Section 4.1, "If not load-time metric is available...", changed "not" to "no".

Section 5, made title plural (Recommendations)



The following feedback did not result in changes to the document, as these are either due for the next iteration of RSSAC002, or the current text is still valid. 

Section 3, third bullet - is this still true? If this was for NSD, it has
been corrected.

Section 2.1 - For v3 of the document I would like to see more details on how
this value should be computed, for the sake of consistency. For example, I
have six servers that receive notifies directly from the distribution masters.
Should the load-time value be computed on each server separately and then
averaged (this is what I am currently doing)? Or should the notify and load
times from all servers be collected centrally and the value computed by
subtracting the earliest (first received) notify time from the latest/last
load time? What if a notify is never received (by an individual server in
the first case or by any of the servers in the second case)?



Attached please find the latest document incorporating these changes. The deadline to review is still close of business Monday 23 November. 

Best
Steve





On 11/19/15, 7:24 AM, "Kash, Howard M CIV USARMY RDECOM ARL (US)" <howard.m.kash.civ at mail.mil> wrote:

>Section 4.1, second paragraph, "The latency in the distribution system" needs
>to be changed to "Latency in publishing available data".
>
>Section 3, third bullet - is this still true?  If this was for NSD, it has
>been corrected.
>
>Section 2.1 - For v3 of the document I would like to see more details on how
>this value should be computed, for the sake of consistency.  For example, I
>have six servers that receive notifies directly from the distribution masters.
>Should the load-time value be computed on each server separately and then
>averaged (this is what I am currently doing)?  Or should the notify and load
>times from all servers be collected centrally and the value computed by
>subtracting the earliest (first received) notify time from the latest/last
>load time?  What if a notify is never received (by an individual server in
>the first case or by any of the servers in the second case)?
>
>Section 2.1, second paragraph - "may present as anomalies in measurements",
>perhaps change to "may introduce anomalies"?
>
>Section 4.1, "If not load-time metric is available...", change "not" to "no".
>
>Section 5, make title plural (Recommendations)
>
>
>Thanks,
>Howard
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 20 November 2015 DRAFT RSSAC002 version 2.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 144867 bytes
Desc: 20 November 2015 DRAFT RSSAC002 version 2.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rssac-caucus/attachments/20151120/8cbd527f/20November2015DRAFTRSSAC002version2.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 20 November 2015 DRAFT RSSAC002 version 2 CLEAN.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 140410 bytes
Desc: 20 November 2015 DRAFT RSSAC002 version 2 CLEAN.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rssac-caucus/attachments/20151120/8cbd527f/20November2015DRAFTRSSAC002version2CLEAN.docx>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 20 November 2015 DRAFT RSSAC002 version 2 CLEAN.pdf
Type: application/pdf
Size: 203588 bytes
Desc: 20 November 2015 DRAFT RSSAC002 version 2 CLEAN.pdf
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rssac-caucus/attachments/20151120/8cbd527f/20November2015DRAFTRSSAC002version2CLEAN.pdf>