[rssac-caucus] Opening RSSAC-002 for revision

[Ray Bellis]

On 20/10/2015 21:45, Wessels, Duane wrote:

> I don't really get this argument.  I don't see why the "width" of the histogram
> matters.  And I don't see, from an RSSAC-002 perspective, why it matters if packets
> end up int he same bin or not.  The measurements are highly aggregated.  

It's not a big deal either way, but to me the proposal to make the
figures inclusive rather than exclusive feels intuitively wrong.

Many common EDNS buffer sizes are multiples of 16 bytes, so IMHO the
results will just be that little bit more accurate if the framing octets
are omitted.

Ray