[rssac-caucus] rssac-002 rcode distribution and traffic volume

Roy Arends roy.arends at icann.org
Tue Jan 12 10:15:58 UTC 2016


On 11/01/2016, 10:50, "rssac-caucus-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Daniel
Karrenberg" <rssac-caucus-bounces at icann.org on behalf of
daniel.karrenberg at ripe.net> wrote:

>My understanding is that RSSAC002 is to be interpreted from the
>perspective of (measuring the) server behavior. Imo this is also clear
>from the document itself even if specific sentences may be regarded as
>ambiguous.

Thanks for your response Daniel.

Measuring the server behavior; does that imply that your interpretation is
that only responses that are send by the root-server should be considered?
And thus not responses received by the root-server?

>Of course clarification is always good.

Indeed.

Warmly,

Roy

>
>Daniel
>
>On 8.01.16 18:05 , Roy Arends wrote:
>> Hi,
>> 
>> Section 2.5 reads "The RCODE distribution is a raw count of the RCODE
>> values observed in responses during the reporting period.”
>> 
>> This single sentence is ambiguous, since it is interpreted in two ways.
>> Either it includes responses received, or it doesn’t. That needs to be
>> clarified, otherwise the numbers are meaningless as they can’t be
>>compared.
>> 
>> Section 4.3 has a similar ambiguity. Does “responses-sent” mean sent by
>> the root server, or sent by something else, and observed by the root
>> server.
>> 
>> Warm regards and happy new year!
>> 
>> Roy
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> rssac-caucus mailing list
>> rssac-caucus at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rssac-caucus
>> 
>_______________________________________________
>rssac-caucus mailing list
>rssac-caucus at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rssac-caucus



More information about the rssac-caucus mailing list