[rssac-caucus] NSID support on the root-servers

[Terry Manderson]

I agree,

I think not only considering if it is worthwhile but also evaluating if providing a definition as to what the root letter's use of NSID means has any utility. 

Of the CH TXT entries, some are obvious, some are not (and of course does that matter).

Cheers
Terry


> On 17 Oct 2016, at 2:53 AM, Wessels, Duane <dwessels at verisign.com> wrote:
> 
> This sounds like a good item for "Service Expectations of Root Servers" (RSSAC001) the next time that document gets updated.
> 
> DW
> 
> 
>> On Oct 16, 2016, at 11:30 AM, Ondřej Surý <ondrej.sury at nic.cz> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> I just did a quick test (after seeing yet another
>> "we are using CH TXT") for NSID support at root
>> level and only 6 out of 13 of letters did support
>> NSID.
>> 
>> Is this something worth enough for RSSAC to look
>> into?  Ideally it would be great to have NSID
>> support at all root-server instances.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> --
>> Ondřej Surý -- Technical Fellow
>> --------------------------------------------
>> CZ.NIC, z.s.p.o.    --     Laboratoře CZ.NIC
>> Milesovska 5, 130 00 Praha 3, Czech Republic
>> mailto:ondrej.sury at nic.cz    https://nic.cz/
>> --------------------------------------------
>> _______________________________________________
>> rssac-caucus mailing list
>> rssac-caucus at icann.org
>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rssac-caucus
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rssac-caucus mailing list
> rssac-caucus at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rssac-caucus