<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"><style>body { line-height: 1.5; }blockquote { margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 0.5em; }div.FoxDiv20190820092134560041 { word-wrap: break-word; }body { font-size: 10.5pt; font-family: ????; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); line-height: 1.5; }</style></head><body>
<div><span></span>I think we may need to consider the adoption situation of new technologies from the view of root servers, such as new transport protocols (QUIC) and DoT/DoH and RFC7816...... although some have not been widely deployed yet. </div>
<div><br></div>
<hr style="width: 210px; height: 1px;" align="left" color="#b5c4df" size="1">
<div><span><div style="MARGIN: 10px; FONT-FAMILY: verdana; FONT-SIZE: 10pt"><div>YAN Zhiwei</div></div></span></div><blockquote style="margin-top: 0px; margin-bottom: 0px; margin-left: 2em;"><div> </div><div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm"><div style="PADDING-RIGHT: 8px; PADDING-LEFT: 8px; FONT-SIZE: 12px;FONT-FAMILY:tahoma;COLOR:#000000; BACKGROUND: #efefef; PADDING-BOTTOM: 8px; PADDING-TOP: 8px"><div><b>From:</b> <a href="mailto:andrew.mcconachie@icann.org">Andrew McConachie</a></div><div><b>Date:</b> 2019-08-19 16:11</div><div><b>To:</b> <a href="mailto:rssac-caucus@icann.org">rssac-caucus</a></div><div><b>Subject:</b> [RSSAC Caucus] Revisiting RSSAC002v3</div></div></div><div><div class="FoxDiv20190820092134560041">
Dear RSSAC Caucus,<br class="">
<br class="">
RSSAC002v3 recommendation 3 states: "Measurements outlined in this document should be revisited in two years to accommodate changes in DNS technologies."<br class="">
<<a href="https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/rssac-002-measurements-root-06jun16-en.pdf" class="">https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/rssac-002-measurements-root-06jun16-en.pdf</a>> <br class="">
<br class="">
RSSAC002v3 was published in June 2016 so we are over due in revisiting it.<br class="">
<br class="">
The purpose of this mail is to solicit feedback on whether a new version of RSSAC002 is needed. If you feel there is a compelling reason for the RSSAC to produce a new version of RSSAC002 please reply all to this email. Please explain the reason why and which
measurement(s) you believe should be altered.<br class="">
<br class="">
Please reply all to this email by <b class="">September 1, 2019</b>.<br class="">
<br class="">
Thanks,<br class="">
Andrew<br class="">
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
</div></div></blockquote>
</body></html>