
<html>


<head>


<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8">


</head>


<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; line-break: after-white-space;" class="">


<br class="">


<div><br class="">


<blockquote type="cite" class="">


<div class="">On Jan 9, 2020, at 00:46, Paul Hoffman <<a href="mailto:paul.hoffman@icann.org" class="">paul.hoffman@icann.org</a>> wrote:</div>


<div class="">


<div class=""><br class="">


<blockquote type="cite" class="">I worry that, as written, there is ambiguity.  Is RSSAC requesting a single study that<br class="">


would evaluate both alg roll and length change?  or separate studies?  Would a single study<br class="">


on length change only satisfy the recommendation (since it says "or")?<br class="">


</blockquote>


<br class="">


The latter was what I intended, but I see where there is ambiguity. Better wording might be "... studying and documenting a comprehensive approach to an algorithm rollover, or to a key length change, …”</div>


</div>


</blockquote>


<div><br class="">


</div>


I’ve included this suggested text in the document.</div>


<div><<a href="https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U1qKPRx9URRfiI4jijvLKSCS2W6upZRDppUsbANqIOg/edit?usp=sharing" class="">https://docs.google.com/document/d/1U1qKPRx9URRfiI4jijvLKSCS2W6upZRDppUsbANqIOg/edit?usp=sharing</a>> </div>


</body>


</html>