[RSS GWG] Follow-up from teleconference #13

Thu Sep 3 17:50:29 UTC 2020

Dear all,I am fully agreed for recommendation of Kurt, furthermore there is some consideration about the relationship between PRS and SAPF. Moreover, during the IANA transition, beside the PTI, there is also the CSC and RZERC maybe can consider for that. Indeed our purpose which is to improve the accountability and transparency for the RSS, so we should consider more voice from the community, such as GAC\ALAC and so on.Geoff also mentioned a really good point that the community such as SSAC, it is maybe only suitable for the Liasion, so we should consider the community purpose as the advisory or support organization.
As listed by kurt our RSS GWG has 10 members and 3 liasions:

member：
-the Root Server operators（3）
- the IETF / （2）
- ccTLD registries（2）
- gTLD registries（2）
Liasion：ICANN Board、IANA、and VeriSign

For the CSC Member: - ccTLD registries（2）
- gTLD registries（2）
Liasion: SSAC\ALAC\RSSAC\GNSO(non-registry)\GAC\PTI

For the RZERC:SSAC\RSSAC\ASO\IETF(IAB)\ccNSO\Verisign (Root Zone Maintainer)\ICANN Board\PTI
and 2 ICANN support staffIn conclude, the proposed structure as below, please have a look 

Member：
-the Root Server operators（3）
- ccTLD registries（2）
- gTLD registries（2）
-the IETF / （2）

Liasion:
-SSAC(1)
-ALAC(1）
-GNSO(non-registry)（1)
-GAC(1)
-PTI(1)
-PRS(1)
-ICANN board(1)

ICANN Support Team:(2)

Best Regards
hanyu

-----原始邮件-----
发件人:"Kurt Pritz" <kurt at kjpritz.com>
发送时间:2020-08-29 01:35:12 (星期六)
收件人: "rssgwg at icann.org" <rssgwg at icann.org>
抄送:
主题: Re: [RSS GWG] Follow-up from teleconference #13

I’d be for an SAPF of a size toward the lower end of the range that Liman proposes: large enough to avoid some type of “group think” mentality and also provide diversity but small enough to have a conversation or discussion. As a group gets to a size of 20 and above, there are queues to speak and barriers to open communication. This type of SAPF would operate as a representative Council where each representative would consult as needed or desires by their stakeholder group.  

For representation, I recommend that we consider the composition of this team, that was assembled with some thought. Board liaisons would probably be in appropriate but otherwise, I think the composition of this team appropriately reflects the ecosystem we want to manage and facilitate:

IAB Representative (2)
RSO Representative(3)
SSAC Representative (1) 
ccTLD Registries Representative (2)
gTLD Registries Representative (2)
Liaison from the IANA
Liaison from Root Zone Maintainer

We might increase the RSO membership to ensure representation of diverse operating models. 

Thanks for listening and best regards,

Kurt

On Aug 25, 2020, at 11:31 AM, Ted Hardie <ted.ietf at gmail.com> wrote:

Thanks, Carlos.

As a reminder to the group, we did ask on the call for folks to answer two questions via email in advance of our next meeting:  how large should the SAPF be?  which groups must be represented for the SAPF to be able to make the policy decisions which will be under its remit?

I know that there were significant differences of opinion even in the short time we had last Thursday, and I am hopeful we can get some discussion going in advance of the next call.

best regards,

Ted

On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 9:58 AM Carlos Reyes <carlos.reyes at icann.org> wrote:

Hello, all.

The approved minutes from teleconference #12 and the recordings from teleconference #13 are available here.

I will have the draft minutes from teleconference #13 for your review this week.

Best,
Carlos

Carlos Reyes

Director, Strategic Policy Planning

Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

_______________________________________________
RSSGWG mailing list
RSSGWG at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rssgwg

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.
_______________________________________________
RSSGWG mailing list
RSSGWG at icann.org
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rssgwg

_______________________________________________
By submitting your personal data, you consent to the processing of your personal data for purposes of subscribing to this mailing list accordance with the ICANN Privacy Policy (https://www.icann.org/privacy/policy) and the website Terms of Service (https://www.icann.org/privacy/tos). You can visit the Mailman link above to change your membership status or configuration, including unsubscribing, setting digest-style delivery or disabling delivery altogether (e.g., for a vacation), and so on.

杨涵喻

中国信息通信研究院

工业互联网与物联网研究所

地址：北京市海淀区花园北路52号
手机：+86 13522678997
邮箱：yanghanyu at caict.ac.cn

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rssgwg/attachments/20200904/4c8c66cb/attachment.html>