[Rt4-whois] NORC Study cost

[Smith, Bill]

Probably happy to pay $200,000 a year to get Whois cleaned up, perhaps more.

On Mar 14, 2012, at 6:58 PM, <jbladel at godaddy.com>
 <jbladel at godaddy.com> wrote:

> So the eCommerce Industry should reimburse ICANN? 
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] NORC Study cost
> From: "Smith, Bill" &lt;bill.smith at paypal-inc.com&gt;
> Date: Mar 14, 2012 18:18
> To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com>
> CC: denise.michel at icann.org,rt4-whois at icann.org
> 
> Agreed... but it's a small amount if it manages to reduce the 2-3 billion dollars of e-commerce fraud that Visa projected in its presentation at the RAA update/WHOIS Verification Workshop on Monday.
> 
> On Mar 14, 2012, at 2:29 PM, James M. Bladel wrote:
> 
> Thanks, Denise.  IMHO, that's a pretty significant expense on an annual basis.
> 
> J.
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: NORC Study cost
> From: Denise Michel <denise.michel at icann.org><mailto:denise.michel at icann.org>>
> Date: Wed, March 14, 2012 3:15 pm
> To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel at godaddy.com><mailto:jbladel at godaddy.com>>
> Cc: rt4-whois at icann.org<mailto:rt4-whois at icann.org>
> 
> The NORC Accuracy Study involved a sample size of 1000 registrations, and cost ICANN approximately US$200,000.
> 
> 
> Denise Michel
> ICANN
> Advisor to the President & CEO
> denise.michel at icann.org<mailto:denise.michel at icann.org>
> +1.408.429.3072<tel:+1.408.429.3072> mobile
> +1.310.578.8632<tel:+1.310.578.8632> direct
> _______________________________________________
> Rt4-whois mailing list
> Rt4-whois at icann.org<mailto:Rt4-whois at icann.org>
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois