<html><body><span style="font-family:Arial; color:#000000; font-size:10pt;"><div>Also noteworthy is that the ATRT struggled with its definition of "Public Interest" beginning on page 62 of its final report:<br></div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://icann.org/en/reviews/affirmation/atrt-final-recommendations-31dec10-en.pdf">http://icann.org/en/reviews/affirmation/atrt-final-recommendations-31dec10-en.pdf</a></div><div><br></div><div>Thanks--</div><div><br></div><div>J.</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>-------- Original Message --------<br></div><blockquote id="replyBlockquote" webmail="1" style="border-left: 2px solid blue; margin-left: 8px; padding-left: 8px; font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: verdana;"><div id="wmQuoteWrapper">
Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Scope of Work<br>
From: "James M. Bladel" <<a href="mailto:jbladel@godaddy.com">jbladel@godaddy.com</a>><br>
Date: Mon, January 03, 2011 12:01 pm<br>
To: <a href="mailto:lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com">lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com</a><br>
Cc: <a href="mailto:rt4-whois@icann.org">rt4-whois@icann.org</a><br>
<br>
<span style="font-family: Arial; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 10pt;"><div>Team:<br><br>I guess I'm not entirely clear on the distinction between "Public Interest" and the "Interests of the Stakeholders." In my view, the component organizations (GNSO, ccNSO, SSAC, ALAC, etc.) and their subordinate organizations & constituencies, were the components of the "Public Interests." Or are we saying that this term is more than the sum of its parts?<br><br>Looking forward to some clarifying dialogue on this.</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks--</div><div><br></div><div>J.</div><div><br></div> <blockquote id="replyBlockquote" webmail="1" style="border-left: 2px solid blue; margin-left: 8px; padding-left: 8px; font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: verdana;"> <div id="wmQuoteWrapper"> -------- Original Message --------<br> Subject: Re: [Rt4-whois] Scope of Work<br> From: <<a target="_blank" href="mailto:lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com">lynn@goodsecurityconsulting.com</a>><br> Date: Sun, January 02, 2011 5:54 pm<br> To: "Emily Taylor" <<a target="_blank" href="mailto:emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk">emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk</a>><br> Cc: <a target="_blank" href="mailto:rt4-whois@icann.org">rt4-whois@icann.org</a><br> <br> <span style="font-family: Verdana; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-size: 10pt;"><div><br></div><div>Hi Emily,</div><div>I agree with your amendment regarding policy in the public interest rather than a particular set of stakeholders.</div><div>The questions you have outlined should spark a useful and necessary discussion at our meeting.</div><div>Kind regards,</div><div>Lynn</div><div><br></div> <blockquote id="replyBlockquote" webmail="1" style="border-left: 2px solid blue; margin-left: 8px; padding-left: 8px; font-size: 10pt; color: black; font-family: verdana;"> <div id="wmQuoteWrapper"> -------- Original Message --------<br> Subject: [Rt4-whois] Scope of Work<br> From: Emily Taylor <<a target="_blank" href="mailto:emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk">emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk</a>><br> Date: Sun, January 02, 2011 12:43 pm<br> To: RT4 WHOIS <<a target="_blank" href="mailto:rt4-whois@icann.org">rt4-whois@icann.org</a>><br> <br> Hi all<div><br></div><div>I'm belatedly replying to Kathy's thread, and her updates on the Scope document following the Cartagena meeting. Bearing in mind that we should be aiming to communicate our scope of work to both ICANN insiders and those not so familiar with the context of these review teams, I have amended the draft scope to add in context from the AoC, including quoting the fact that the team is constituted under the AoC, the relevant paragraph (9.3.1) and other overarching principles contained within the AoC relating to ICANN's obligations to make policy in the public interest and "not just in the interests of a particular set of stakeholders" (para 4).</div><div><br></div><div>One of the questions that I have in approaching our work, which I hope we will discuss in London, is to what extent should we be looking at the policy process which has led to the current WHOIS policy - because it seems to me that these overarching principles about public interest vs interests of particular stakeholders is in part answered by a look at (1) where does responsibility for Whois policy formation sit within the ICANN organisation (2) how do the relevant strands (gNSO, GAC, SSAC) that we see referenced in the background materials provided by staff fit together, and what role does the board play and (3) with regard to WHOIS policy, what mechanisms/processes are in place to ensure that the end result is made in the public interest?</div><div><br></div><div>Please take a look at the draft Scope. I tried to save the changes, and I think they are there, but the screen went a bit funny, so for completeness, here is a copy of the complete scope as amended by me today (see below).</div><div><br></div><div>Best regards</div><div><br></div><div>Emily</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px;">---------------------</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px;"><br></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px;"><br></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px;">The WHOIS Review Team (WRT) has been constituted under the Affirmation of Commitments by the United States Department of Commerce and the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers dated 30 September 2009 (AoC).</span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 13px; line-height: 17px;"><div style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 13pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: normal; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px;">Under paragraph 9.3.1 of the AoC, ICANN commits to organising "a review of WHOIS policy and its implementation to assess the extent to which WHOIS policy is effective and its implementation meets the legitimate needs of law enforcement and promotes consumer trust."</div><div style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 13pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: normal; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px;">Accordingly, the Scope of the Whois Review Team is to assess the extent to which existing WHOIS policy and its implementation:</div><ul style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 13pt; list-style-type: disc;"><li style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 13pt; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">is effective,</li><li style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 13pt; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">meets the legitimate needs of law enforcement, and</li><li style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 13pt; margin: 0px; padding: 0px;">promotes consumer trust.</li></ul><div style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 13pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: normal; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px;">The WRT will identify and document ICANN’s existing WHOIS policy.</div><div style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 13pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: normal; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px;">The WRT will identify and document ICANN's implementation of its Whois Policy.</div><div style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 13pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: normal; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px;">It will define and identify law enforcement, and the term "legitimate needs of law enforcement."</div><div style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 13pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: normal; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px;">It will define consumer trust and analyse what factors promote consumer trust in the context of the Whois.</div><div style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 13pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: normal; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px;">It will identify the areas, if any, in which the interests above may be in conflict with each other.</div><div style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 13pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: normal; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px;">It will assess applicable laws and analyze issues possibly including:</div><div style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 13pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: normal; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px;"> - contractual obligations vs. national law obligations</div><div style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 13pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: normal; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px;"> - differing global laws and ICANN obligations</div><div style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 13pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: normal; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px;">It will review the extent to which ICANN’s existing WHOIS policy and its implementation are effective in meeting the legitimate needs of law enforcement and promotes consumer trust.</div><div style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 13pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: normal; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px;">This assessment will include an evidence-based approach, and seek to identify good practice in other areas of the domain space (as a benchmarking tool).</div><div style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 13pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: normal; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px;">The assessment will keep in mind overarching principles set out in the AoC in relation to ICANN's policy, ie that "decisions made related to the global technical coordination of the DNS are made in the public interest and are accountable and transparent" (paragraph 3(a)) "promote competition, consumer trust, and consumer choice in the DNS marketplace" (paragraph 3(c)), and that the outcomes of ICANN's private coordinating process should "reflect the public interest...and not just the interests of a particular set of stakeholders" (paragraph 4). These principles set the context for the reviews (of which the WRT is one) performed under the AoC.</div><div style="font-size: 10pt; line-height: 13pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-weight: normal; margin: 10px 0px; padding: 0px;">The WRT will undertake an analysis and determination of ICANN's performance against the AOC requirement that ICANN implement measures to maintain timely, unrestricted and public access to accurate and complete WHOIS information, including registrant, technical, billing, and administrative contact information, and what impact such requirement have on the legitimate needs of law enforcement and promoting consumer trust. </div></span><div> <style type="text/css">
#wmQuoteWrapper #wmQuoteWrapper #wmQuoteWrapper {margin:0;padding:10px;font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;}
#wmQuoteWrapper #wmQuoteWrapper #wmQuoteWrapper html {margin: 0;padding: 0;}
#wmQuoteWrapper #wmQuoteWrapper #wmQuoteWrapper img {margin-bottom: 20px;}
#wmQuoteWrapper #wmQuoteWrapper #wmQuoteWrapper p {font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size: 14px;color: #666;}
#wmQuoteWrapper #wmQuoteWrapper #wmQuoteWrapper a {color: #333;font-weight: bold;}
#wmQuoteWrapper #wmQuoteWrapper #wmQuoteWrapper .bold {font-weight: bold;}
</style> <img style="margin-top: 20px;" moz-do-not-send="true" src="http://www.etlaw.co.uk/images/stories/etlaw/logo310.gif" alt="Emily Taylor Consultant (Internet Law and Governance)" height="47" width="310"> <div style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif; font-size: 14px; color: rgb(102, 102, 102);">76 Temple Road, Oxford OX4 2EZ UK <br> telephone: <b> 01865 582 811</b> mobile: <b> 07540 049 322</b> <br> <a target="_blank" href="mailto:emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk">emily.taylor@etlaw.co.uk</a> <a target="_blank" href="http://www.etlaw.co.uk">www.etlaw.co.uk</a><br mce_bogus="1"></div> </div> <br></div><hr>_______________________________________________<br> Rt4-whois mailing list<br> <a target="_blank" href="mailto:Rt4-whois@icann.org">Rt4-whois@icann.org</a><br> <a target="_blank" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois</a><br> </div> </blockquote></span> <hr>_______________________________________________<br> Rt4-whois mailing list<br> <a target="_blank" href="mailto:Rt4-whois@icann.org">Rt4-whois@icann.org</a><br> <a target="_blank" href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois</a><br> </div> </blockquote></span> <hr>_______________________________________________<br>
Rt4-whois mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Rt4-whois@icann.org">Rt4-whois@icann.org</a><br>
<a href="https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois">https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/rt4-whois</a><br>
</div>
</blockquote></span></body></html>