<html><head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=Windows-1252"></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); "><div style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; "><div><div>Dear Review Team Members, </div><div>Please find enclosed the pod content of your conference call held on 11 April. </div><div>A preliminary report will be drafted.</div><div>Thanks, </div><div>Kind regards </div><div>Alice -- </div></div></div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><top style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; "><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:14pt;color:#990000;font-family: Arial"><b>WHOIS Policy Review Team Conference call – 11 April - 17:00 UTC</b></pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#0000FF;font-family: Arial"><b>AGENDA</b></pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">1. Roll call & apologies</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">2. Adopt preliminary report (4 April) </pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">3. Continuing walk through of ICANN Staff comments and queries on Recommendations, starting at Recommendation 12 (Denise)</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">4. Update from action item penholders <a href="https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Action+Items+-+Spring+2012">https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreview/Action+Items+-+Spring+2012</a> and ongoing review of proposed new texts <a href="https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreviewprivate/Final+Report">https://community.icann.org/display/whoisreviewprivate/Final+Report</a></pre><p></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial"><li>Data Accuracy recommendations</li></pre><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial"><li>Proxy & privacy recommendations</li></pre><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial"><li>Recommendation 3 & 17</li></pre><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial"><li>Deaccreditation</li></pre><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial"><li>IDN recommendations</li></pre><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial"><li>Language on timeframes and implementation paths</li></pre><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial"><li>Compliance recommendations</li></pre><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">5. Next steps</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">6. A.O.B</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#990099;font-family: Arial"><b>PARTICIPANTS </b><pre style="color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Susan Kawaguchi, Kathy Kleiman, James Bladel, Lynn Goodendorf, Emily Taylor, Michael Yakushev, Seth Reiss, Sarmad Hussain</pre></pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#CC6600;font-family: Arial"><b>ICANN STAFF </b><pre style="color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Olof Nordling, Alice Jansen, Denise Michel</pre></pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#009900;font-family: Arial"><b>APOLOGIES</b></pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Peter Nettlefold, Bill Smith, Lutz Donnerhacke, Omar Kaminski, Sharon Lemon</pre></top><top style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; "><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#CC6600;font-family: Arial"><b>NOTES</b></pre></top><top style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; "><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">1. Agenda amendments - A.O.B - WHOIS><ICANN Staff call + data validation (Larry Strickling letter) - </pre></top></span><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 15px;">Preliminary report adopted</span></div><span id="OLK_SRC_BODY_SECTION"><top style="font-family: Calibri, sans-serif; font-size: 14px; "><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">2. Rec 5 - Susan - substantial failure - James avoid undeliverable. Full failure/substantial failure. Need clear language - contactable not clear enough. ET proposal to adopt substantial/full failure terms. James: redefine those terms. Body of report - (SK) + (JB) to insert references into draft footnotes. Proposal to have a references section. (SK) to circulate finding, agreed recommendations, add wordings. 4/3 paragraphs of findings.</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">3. Staff comments </pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Rec 12: Voluntary discussions with proxy providers that ICANN has no contractual relationships with. Proxy services - big in RAA negotiations. Depending on how negotiations play out and on the Team's recommendations, this may require a GNSO consensus policy. </pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Rec 13</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Update on this topic next week. Need to explore various ways this could be implemented</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Rec 14 RAA negotiations would come into play.</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Rec 15 Staff is exploring a different range of ways this might be implemented and what the implications are.</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Rec 16 Currently RAA hold registrant holder responsible. In 2010 a draft - verify terms in RAA. Draft advisory submitted for comments. </pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">(KK) negotiations and studies going on: do we want to change our recommendations in light of that or shall we keep a high level approach? </pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">(JB) If group to reach out to Staff for RAA negotiations update, could open up to accusations then will need to recuse myself. </pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">(SR) should not respon to ongoing negotiations. Proposal to note that ongoing studies and negotiations </pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">(JB) advisoy draft not welcomed in Cartagena. </pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">(LG) come back to primary purpose: evaluate effectiveness WHOIS. We can certainly acknowledge activities and progress but at this point in time, the issue is there. Make sure that identified anything that hinders WHOIS.</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">(DM) Not endorsing nor encouraging this advisory approach but will provide summary of comments so that Team can get a clearer picture of discussion at time.</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Rec 17 Feasible recommendation but investigations needed to implement recommendation. Connection to IRD WG. Staff noted issues that need to be explored: capacity planning, technical scaling, legal issues. </pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">(ET) enhancing current Internet service so no huge relocation or reassignment of data. </pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Rec 18 - Rec 19 - Rec 20</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Not ICANN's remit to determine encoding. That is fully within the role of IETF. addtional resources would be needed</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Rec 18 (SH) standards have not been adopted yet. Why and suggestions?</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">(DM) serious concerns regarding compatability issue. Happy to provide additional material. Call with Steve Sheng to be scheduled (IDN subteam)</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Team thanks DM</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">4 Proxy/Privacy recommendations</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Progress ongoing. Subteam needs to review KK's comments. (ET) thanks for work. (KK)'s draft fleshes out findings and has references to where material is. Please circulate a final draft by Friday, 13 April. (LG) volunteered to help with drafting. (ET) - Clear difference between privacy and proxy services. Better use of time may be to go back to draft report. </pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">5. Recommendation 3 </pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Waiting for information from compliance team which will influence findings and recommendations.</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Historic figures from Staffing. Awaiting updated figures incl. on spendings. </pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">(DM): Stacy Burnette's slides in London included staffing chart that included full time staff. Discrepancy because of that. (SK) to propose some language. (ET) to integrate (PN), (KK) and (SK)'s comments.</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">6. Recommendation 17</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">(DM) highlight areas where unclear + implementation . </pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">(KK) to propose new iteration - if substantive edits, this rec will be back on action items list.</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">7 Deaccreditation</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Refer to slide from Maguy Serad and Bill's comment. Mention incentives when talking about penalties - holistic approach. (JB) to circulate language by next call</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">8 IDN recommendations</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Conversation with Steve Cheng and come up with draft</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Subteam will have a call with Steve Cheng and are working on clarifying draft recommendations and hope to share language.</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">9 Language on timeframes </pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">No follow-up action is required on this except make it more general. Language adopted and will be a separate recommendation at the end of data accuracy recommendation. 6 months from when Board received final report. List timing from AoC. </pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">10. Compliance recommendations</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">No progress. More work to be done. (AJ) to organize subteam call to discussion findings and recommendations within next week or so. </pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">11. Next steps</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">A.O.B</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Call with ICANN Staff scheduled for Monday, 16 April - 22:30 UTC</pre><p></p><p align="LEFT"></p><pre style="font-size:11pt;color:#000000;font-family: Arial">Discussion on validation reverted to next call.</pre><p></p></top></span></body></html>