[RZERC] RZERC presentation Public Meeting

[Howard Eland]

> On Oct 31, 2017, at 10:10 AM, Jim Reid <jim at rfc1035.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 31 Oct 2017, at 14:42, Howard Eland <heland at afilias.info> wrote:
>> 
>> Again on the “Potential Topics” slide, it reads pretty “wishy-washy” to me.  One we might consider, one we’re not even sure if we’d consider or not, etc.
>> 
>> I’d much rather we gave examples of things we will clearly do and not do, so people have more definitive guidance.
> 
> I thought we were doing that as well as example of something which is in the maybe category?

I don’t believe I was clear (irony noted).  I wasn’t commenting on the topics chosen to represent the scenarios on that slide, per se.  I was looking for a more assertive tone underneath: “This is out of scope”, not “Moderate consensus for out-of-scope” - this is alluded to on Slide 5.

-H
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rzerc/attachments/20171031/f50fd729/signature.asc>