[social-media-wg] SoMe Strategy Document

Adebunmi AKINBO akinbo.adebunmi at gmail.com
Wed Jun 6 01:21:36 UTC 2018


Susannah,
Great remark. However, I want to correct a notion on our work with
Instagram. A lot can be passed across considering that everyone gets to use
the website.

Am into graphics and a lot of us needs to understand that our greatest
assets online is the Instagram.

One the graphics points to the content, we are home and dry. Members of the
team can easily adapt and transfer to adoptive regional platform or
channels.

Regards.

On Mon, 4 Jun 2018, 8:33 pm Susannah Gray, <susannah.gray at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> Thank you for sending this. A couple of comments below:
>
> On 03/06/2018 10:23, John Laprise wrote:
>
> At Large SoMe Strategy
>
>
>
> Distributed ALAC Social Media (SoMe) Strategy
>
> Purpose: To enhance global engagement with At Large and build awareness
>
> - Who do we want to engage with us - our fellow At Large colleagues, other
> SO/ACs, general Internet community and/or the general public?
>
> I believe we should have different strategies and approaches depending on
> who we are communicating with and why and this should be the first thing we
> document so we are all on the same page about what we're trying to achieve
> (happy to put together a few ideas and circulate if you like).
>
> For example, if we want to get more people involved, the messages and
> possibly the platforms should be very different than if we want to get
> current At-Large members to comment on an ICANN document or plan for
> upcoming sessions at an ICANN meeting.
>
> Constraints: Global, disparate, multilingual user base with issues of
> regional import arising
>
> Primary Media: Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, Instagram
>
> - As others have pointed out, the 'big four' only work in certain regions
> and for certain demographics. Russia/China have their own social networks
> and anyone under 25 is probably not on any of these except Instagram
> (which, in my possibly Luddite-like view, is not going to be of much use to
> us as our content and focus are not very photogenic). I think it may be a
> good idea to have each RALO put forth the networks that work for them.
>
>
> Plan:
>
> •           RALO leadership should identify 5-10 top SoMe users within
> their constituencies based on engagement/followers and directly approach
> them to be deputy content curators.
>
> - So the idea is that SoME deputies will forward relevant content to Evin,
> who will then post it on the At-Large accounts (or will she be actively
> following all the deputies and simply retweeting/reposting etc?). I think
> this is a good plan.
>
> However, with my organisational communications hat on and as someone who
> manages numerous social media accounts on behalf of others, I'd personally
> be very wary of publishing content from an official account in a language
> that I couldn't understand in case it was inflammatory/incorrect/not
> relevant. I guess we have to be absolutely sure that SoMe deputies are
> crystal clear on what kind of content should be disseminated. Again I think
> this is something that we should try to document asap.
>
> •           RALO leadership should select one of these deputies to be
> overall SoMe chair at the RALO level who will interact with the SoMe
> working group and with ICANN
>
> •           Upon their agreement, those content curators should share
> their best At Large relevant content (in original languages)with Evin @
> AtLarge for global sharing on At Large formal channels.
>
> - Can we also get a list of formal At-Large channels?
>
> •           RALOs should compile spreadsheets listing SoMe handles of ALSs
> and individual members, country of origin, and primary language of
> composition
>
> •           These lists should be publicly shared and interested At Large
> members encouraged to connect/link/follow these account to build community
> sharing capacity
>
>
>
> - Further, I think we need to separate true social media channels (FB,
> Twitter etc) and communication tools (WhatsApp, Skype, Slack).
> The former should be used to push relevant content and disseminate
> information. The latter should be for discussion/news announcements as they
> are closed groups populated by insiders and we're not going to reach any
> new audiences by using these.
>
> Thanks again for kicking this off!
>
> Susannah
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> John Laprise
>
> NARALO ALAC Representative
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Social-media-WG mailing listSocial-media-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.orghttps://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media-wg
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Social-media-WG mailing list
> Social-media-WG at atlarge-lists.icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/social-media-wg
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/social-media-wg/attachments/20180606/aabd5588/attachment.html>


More information about the Social-media-WG mailing list