[Ssr1implementation-ssr2-rt] Fwd: SSR1 Sub-topic group
ALAIN AINA
aalain at trstech.net
Thu Aug 3 12:47:44 UTC 2017
Staff,
please cancel the today’s meeting
Thanks
—Alain
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: ALAIN AINA <aalain at trstech.net>
> Subject: [Ssr1implementation-ssr2-rt] Fwd: SSR1 Sub-topic group
> Date: 2 August 2017 at 17:43:28 GMT
> To: SSR1implementation-SSR2-RT at icann.org
> Cc: Eric Osterweil <eosterweil at verisign.com>
>
> Denise, Eric,
>
> There is no discussions around this. I am tempted to cancel the call for tomorrow…
>
> —Alain
>
>> Begin forwarded message:
>>
>> From: ALAIN AINA <aalain at trstech.net <mailto:aalain at trstech.net>>
>> Subject: Re: [Ssr1implementation-ssr2-rt] SSR1 Sub-topic group
>> Date: 31 July 2017 at 17:21:25 GMT
>> To: Denise Michel <denisemichel at fb.com <mailto:denisemichel at fb.com>>
>> Cc: "SSR1implementation-SSR2-RT at icann.org <mailto:SSR1implementation-SSR2-RT at icann.org>" <SSR1implementation-SSR2-RT at icann.org <mailto:SSR1implementation-SSR2-RT at icann.org>>, Eric Osterweil <eosterweil at verisign.com <mailto:eosterweil at verisign.com>>
>>
>>
>>> On 28 Jul 2017, at 16:53, Denise Michel <denisemichel at fb.com <mailto:denisemichel at fb.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Alain and Ram.
>>>
>>> Thank you, Alain, for asking the full team for more members for this sub-topic group.
>>
>>
>> And i am worried that it does not generate traffic on the review team list. Beside adding more member to the SSR1 sub-group, my questions also call for general discussions around distribution and traffic load for all.
>>
>> Are we all carrying the same load. ? Fair and equitable distribution? good distribution to get the maximum from team members ?
>>>
>>> In case no one comes forward,
>>
>> The answers to the question above shall help address this...
>>
>>
>>> an alternate path for this group that Eric and I wanted to get your thoughts on was to flesh out the work plan for SSR1 assessment (which includes having a consultant do a gap analysis), and then disband this group and have the full team address the gap analysis and handle follow-on work.
>>
>> I keep saying since the beginning despite what others argued that the SSR1 recommendations's implementation assessment is key for our work.:
>>
>> 1- it is one of the “shall” do
>>
>> 2- it helps the team to get a clear idea of what were the weaknesses, how ICANN was requested to address them, how they were addressed, how things have evolved(positive and negative) and finally what are the take away for the review we are doing….
>>
>>
>> Even if we will use a consultant as other groups may also want, it is important to get this group reinforced as to
>>
>> 1- Assemble data
>> 2- do a preliminary review of the implementation of the recommendations
>> 3- agree on ToR for the consultant
>> 4- work with then consultant to avoid any misunderstanding and make sure, they do what we expect
>> 5- Review consultant report and engage the global team
>>
>>
>> Hope this make a bit sense… I am open for discussions…
>>
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> —Alain
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>>
>>> Thanks.
>>> Denise
>>>
>>> Denise Michel
>>> Domain Name System Strategy & Management
>>> Facebook, Inc.
>>> denisemichel at fb.com <mailto:denisemichel at fb.com>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> SSR1Implementation-SSR2-RT mailing list
>>> SSR1Implementation-SSR2-RT at icann.org <mailto:SSR1Implementation-SSR2-RT at icann.org>
>>> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr1implementation-ssr2-rt <https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr1implementation-ssr2-rt>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> SSR1Implementation-SSR2-RT mailing list
> SSR1Implementation-SSR2-RT at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr1implementation-ssr2-rt
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ssr1implementation-ssr2-rt/attachments/20170803/faa5cd24/attachment.html>
More information about the SSR1Implementation-SSR2-RT
mailing list