[Ssr2-review] SSR2-RT TermsofReference - Initial Draft

James Gannon james at cyberinvasion.net
Wed Apr 5 16:55:32 UTC 2017


PFA my redline.

-James




On 05/04/2017, 15:01, "ssr2-review-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Karen Mulberry" <ssr2-review-bounces at icann.org on behalf of karen.mulberry at icann.org> wrote:

>Geoff,
>
>To answer your question, yes ICANN staff is a resource that the RT can consult with as well as to ask for briefings on areas of interest to the team. The list that was provided in the draft ToR was captured from some initial exchanges from the RT and was meant to be the starting point for the discussion.
>
>Thanks for noting the addition for the list.
> 
>Karen Mulberry
>Multistakeholder Strategy and Strategic Initiatives (MSSI)
>ICANN
> 
> 
>
>On 4/4/17, 7:39 PM, "ssr2-review-bounces at icann.org on behalf of Geoff Huston" <ssr2-review-bounces at icann.org on behalf of gih at apnic.net> wrote:
>
>    Thanks indeed for circulating this Bernie - it is most helpful in terms of grounding some of the thoughts and forming a basis for determining a course to engage with a feasible review program with reasonable timelines and milestones.
>    
>    I particularly appreciate the section"Focus of the SSR2 – Scope of Work“ 
>    
>    Personally I would be happy to see this enumeration of questions for the body of the SSR2 study, as it appears to strike a good balance in building on the SSR1 work, and looking at the changes to the environment in a post-transition ICANN. At the same time this document brings together a concrete set of questions that are not open ended but can form the basis of the SSR2 study 
>    
>    
>    One very minor question - in the "list of communities that the SSR2-RT may consult with” I am assuming that the resource of ICANN’s staff are also included, even though they are not explicitly listed, specifically including the manager of PTI, the CTO, the CSSO (If that’s John Crain’s appropriate title) and other security expert staff, such as Dave Piscatello. Would I be correct in making that assumption?
>    
>    kind regards,
>    
>       Geoff Huston
>    
>    
>    
>    > On 5 Apr 2017, at 12:24 am, Bernard Turcotte <turcotte.bernard at gmail.com> wrote:
>    > 
>    > All,
>    > 
>    > At the request of the Co-Chairs please find attached an initial draft (straw man) of the Review Team Terms of Reference to be discussed at your next RT meeting.
>    > 
>    > Bernard Turcotte
>    > ICANN Staff Support to the SSR2
>    > <Initial Draft SSR2-RT TermsofReference.docx>_______________________________________________
>    > Ssr2-review mailing list
>    > Ssr2-review at icann.org
>    > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
>    
>    _______________________________________________
>    Ssr2-review mailing list
>    Ssr2-review at icann.org
>    https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
>    
>
>_______________________________________________
>Ssr2-review mailing list
>Ssr2-review at icann.org
>https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Initial Draft SSR2-RT TermsofReference.docx
Type: application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
Size: 44940 bytes
Desc: Initial Draft SSR2-RT TermsofReference.docx
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ssr2-review/attachments/20170405/f4395cb3/InitialDraftSSR2-RTTermsofReference.docx>


More information about the Ssr2-review mailing list