[Ssr2-review] Action item 126

[James Gannon]

Hi Jennifer,

In this case then the respective SMEs and departments must make every effort to classify and categorise in advance of our meeting all potential documents that the team may request during the face to face, this will extend to all usual materials that would be requested by an auditor under normal business circumstances which the departments should be very familiar with.

Happy to provide additional details as required,

-James


From: ssr2-review-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ssr2-review-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Jennifer Bryce
Sent: 30 August 2017 16:56
To: SSR2 <ssr2-review at icann.org>
Subject: [Ssr2-review] Action item 126

Hi all,

Regarding action item 126: Request ICANN Legal to be present at ICANN SSR face-to-face meeting, October 9-10 to rule on availability of documents.

ICANN Legal cannot make on-the-spot decisions regarding access to individual documents, and will therefore not be present at the meeting to rule on availability of documents. The process that is followed for document requests is outlined in the revised Confidential Disclosure Framework and Non-Disclosure Agreement, circulated to the review team yesterday, 29 August.

As mentioned in the email yesterday, if you elect not to sign the NDA, there may be instances where you will be restricted from accessing, using or discussing any confidential information provided by ICANN under the NDA. We are working to determine how to best manage requests in this instance and can provide more information when available.

Please let us know if you have any questions.

Best,

Jennifer
--
Jennifer Bryce
Senior Reviews Coordinator
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

Email: jennifer.bryce at icann.org<mailto:jennifer.bryce at icann.org>
Skype: jennifer.bryce.icann
www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ssr2-review/attachments/20170830/56de678b/attachment.html>