[Ssr2-review] Board’s input and comments to SSR2 ToR
jaberamatogoro at gmail.com
Fri Jun 23 18:34:13 UTC 2017
I also propose the same. However, ICANN Remits and ICANN Mission still
requires RT to consider to each sub-group.
In fact, I am struggling to understand this delimitation as our Review
Work is concerned.
One more, suggestion: RT sit together as a group to identify ICANN
Remit and Scope of ICANN Mission to each of the sub-group.
I should also congratulate all the SSR2 RT and ICANN Staff supporting
this team for the step made so far. We are heading to the right
direction. Team spirit and commitment for each RT will lead us to good
end with Recommendation that will help ICANN as organization to move
to next level.
On 6/23/17, James Gannon <james at cyberinvasion.net> wrote:
> Might I suggest that we put some slot into the schedule to discuss a
> response to this item?
> On 23 Jun 2017 5:27 p.m., Kaveh Ranjbar <kaveh.ranjbar at board.icann.org>
> Dear SSR2 Review team,
> Please find attached the Board’s input and comments to the SSR2 Review team
> on the Terms of Reference. These comments are in the spirit of the board
> resolution and bylaws that also appointed me to the Review team (see:
> We hope you find these to be useful, and look forward to positive ongoing
> discussions with the SSR2.
> I look forward to the upcoming Face-to-Face meeting.
> Kind regards,
> Ssr2-review mailing list
> Ssr2-review at icann.org
Assistant Lecturer & Coordinator - Microsoft Innovation Center, Tanzania
College of Informatics and Virtual Education
The University of Dodoma (www.udom.ac.tz)
More information about the Ssr2-review