[Ssr2-review] [EXT] Re: ACTION NEEDED: Input to SO/AC response note

Barrett, Kerry-Ann KABarrett at oas.org
Fri Nov 3 16:25:40 UTC 2017


No prob Geoff.  If changes aren’t accepted I will still support the submission of the draft text as is.



The only ones I would ask you to reconsider are the following.  Rationale is to let it be a bit more precise as to our reasoning when we developed the work plan.







> We would like to offer some general clarifications and comments about the choices in an overview on the overarching tenets that was adopted and guided the approach to the development of the scope that we hope will be helpful to the SO and AC chairs in considering the parameters associated with resuming this effort:

>

> Breadth vs. Depth: We believe in such a review, that it is more helpful to look at breadth and look at the broader aspects of security, stability and resiliency rather than dive into depth in just a small number of issues.  This approach we believe would lend itself to more informed conclusions that can be contextualized.



Sincerely,

Kerry-Ann Barrett

Cyber Security Policy Specialist

Inter-American Committee against Terrorism

Secretariat for Multidimensional Security

Organization of American States

1889 F Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006

T. 202-370-4675

F. 202-458-3857

kabarrett at oas.org

www.oas.org/cyber

Register to our distribution list here!



-----Original Message-----
From: Geoff Huston [mailto:gih at apnic.net]
Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 12:21 PM
To: Barrett, Kerry-Ann <KABarrett at oas.org>
Cc: ssr2-review at icann.org
Subject: Re: [Ssr2-review] [EXT] Re: ACTION NEEDED: Input to SO/AC response note



I oppose these proposed changes. As it stands, its a simple note carrying a very simple message, expressed simply, and I for one don’t see a pressing need for more adjectives here.











> On 3 Nov 2017, at 7:01 pm, Barrett, Kerry-Ann <KABarrett at oas.org<mailto:KABarrett at oas.org>> wrote:

>

> Dear Team

>

> Thank you for the dedicated work and please see some suggestions below to the language in red (which does not affect the essence of what was intended to be conveyed).  Please feel free to accept or reject suggestions.

>

>

> Sincerely,

> Kerry-Ann Barrett

> Cyber Security Policy Specialist

> Inter-American Committee against Terrorism Secretariat for

> Multidimensional Security Organization of American States

> 1889 F Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006 T. 202-370-4675 F.

> 202-458-3857 kabarrett at oas.org<mailto:kabarrett at oas.org> www.oas.org/cyber<http://www.oas.org/cyber> Register to our

> distribution list here!

>

> -----Original Message-----

> From: ssr2-review-bounces at icann.org<mailto:ssr2-review-bounces at icann.org>

> [mailto:ssr2-review-bounces at icann.org] On Behalf Of Boban Krsic

> Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 9:31 AM

> To: ssr2-review at icann.org<mailto:ssr2-review at icann.org>

> Subject: [EXT] Re: [Ssr2-review] ACTION NEEDED: Input to SO/AC

> response note

>

> Hi Folks,

>

> I have no comments or additions - it looks good to me.

>

> Thanks and many greetings to Abu Dhabi.

>

>                 - Boban.

>

>

>

> Am 03.11.17 um 12:32 schrieb Jennifer Bryce:

> > Hi all,

> >

> > The below draft note to SO/AC Chairs was developed by the RT members during the F2F meeting today. Please read, and share any edits or input by 23.59 UTC on Sunday 5 November.

> >

> >

> > ------------------

> >

> > Dear SO/AC Chairs;

> >

> > Please find enclosed a description of the SSR2 Review Team’s perspective the Scope of this review.  As requested, the SSR2 is completing requested item to “[resolve] the issues identified and discussed before and during ICANN60 related to scope”.

> >

> > Scope

> > The SSR2 RT has operated and conducted its work according to its adopted scope (detailed in its Terms of Reference<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64076120/SSR2-TermsofReference-CLEAN%20v4.0%20ET.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1493887766000&api=v2> document), which was adopted by consensus of the SSR RT on 4 May 2017.

> >

> > We would like to offer some general clarifications and comments about the choices in an overview on the overarching tenets that was adopted and guided the approach to the development of the scope that we hope will be helpful to the SO and AC chairs in considering the parameters associated with resuming this effort:

> >

> > Breadth vs. Depth: We believe in such a review, that it is more helpful to look at breadth and look at the broader aspects of security, stability and resiliency rather than dive into depth in just a small number of issues.  This approach we believe would lend itself to more informed conclusions that can be contextualized.  We have operated as a team that while we may review a plethora of documents, we have a fiduciary responsibility to the Community –at-Large to contribute to the stability of ICANN through sound conclusions and recommendations.

> >

> > Capability vs. Behaviours: We believe that it is more helpful in the context of this review to look at the capability of ICANN to manage issues related to security, stability and resilience rather than being overly prescriptive as to how ICANN should respond to particular circumstances that have arisen in the past or may arise in the future. In this context, our review will also include future threats for consideration and proactive planning .

> >

> > Perspective vs. Prescription: We believe that it is more helpful to review aspects of institutional awareness and capability of topics related to security, stability, and resiliency, rather than provide a detailed prescription of the appropriate responses to be used in particular cases.

> >

> > We hope this meets your requirements regarding the review team’s perspective on the scope of this review. The current working terms of references for the review team’s efforts up to the point of this pause in our actions, including a detailed view of the scope of the review, can be found in the reference document cited above.

> >

> > Please let us know if you require anything further.

> >

> > Regards,

> >

> > The Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency Review Team (SSR2 RT)

> >

> >

> >

> > --

> > Jennifer Bryce

> > Senior Reviews Coordinator

> > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)

> >

> > Email: jennifer.bryce at icann.org<mailto:jennifer.bryce at icann.org>

> > Skype: jennifer.bryce.icann

> > www.icann.org<http://www.icann.org>

> >

> >

> >

> > _______________________________________________

> > Ssr2-review mailing list

> > Ssr2-review at icann.org<mailto:Ssr2-review at icann.org>

> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review

> >

>

>

> --

>

> Boban Kršić

> Chief Information Security Officer

>

> DENIC eG, Kaiserstraße 75-77, 60329 Frankfurt am Main, GERMANY

>

> E-Mail: krsic at denic.de<mailto:krsic at denic.de>, Fon: +49 69 272 35-120, Fax: -248

> Mobil: +49 172 67 61 671

> https://www.denic.de

>

> PGP Key-ID: 0x43C89BA9

> Fingerprint: B974 E725 FEF7 CB3A E452 BEE0 5B80 73E9 43C8 9BA9

>

> Angaben nach § 25a Absatz 1 GenG:

> DENIC eG (Sitz: Frankfurt am Main)

> Vorstand: Helga Krüger, Martin Küchenthal, Andreas Musielak, Dr. Jörg

> Schweiger Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Thomas Keller Eingetragen

> unter Nr. 770 im Genossenschaftsregister, Amtsgericht Frankfurt am

> Main

>

> _______________________________________________

> Ssr2-review mailing list

> Ssr2-review at icann.org<mailto:Ssr2-review at icann.org>

> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ssr2-review/attachments/20171103/27c451aa/attachment.html>


More information about the Ssr2-review mailing list