[Ssr2-review] [EXT] Re: ACTION NEEDED: Input to SO/AC response note
jaberamatogoro at gmail.com
Fri Nov 3 16:57:53 UTC 2017
I rather see strong message from Kerry re-phrasing than the one was
proposed before. I will share my edits that will remove the phrasing
as I opposed during our meeting.
On 11/3/17, Geoff Huston <gih at apnic.net> wrote:
> I oppose these proposed changes. As it stands, its a simple note carrying a
> very simple message, expressed simply, and I for one don’t see a pressing
> need for more adjectives here.
>> On 3 Nov 2017, at 7:01 pm, Barrett, Kerry-Ann <KABarrett at oas.org> wrote:
>> Dear Team
>> Thank you for the dedicated work and please see some suggestions below to
>> the language in red (which does not affect the essence of what was
>> intended to be conveyed). Please feel free to accept or reject
>> Kerry-Ann Barrett
>> Cyber Security Policy Specialist
>> Inter-American Committee against Terrorism
>> Secretariat for Multidimensional Security
>> Organization of American States
>> 1889 F Street N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006
>> T. 202-370-4675
>> F. 202-458-3857
>> kabarrett at oas.org
>> Register to our distribution list here!
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: ssr2-review-bounces at icann.org [mailto:ssr2-review-bounces at icann.org]
>> On Behalf Of Boban Krsic
>> Sent: Friday, November 3, 2017 9:31 AM
>> To: ssr2-review at icann.org
>> Subject: [EXT] Re: [Ssr2-review] ACTION NEEDED: Input to SO/AC response
>> Hi Folks,
>> I have no comments or additions - it looks good to me.
>> Thanks and many greetings to Abu Dhabi.
>> - Boban.
>> Am 03.11.17 um 12:32 schrieb Jennifer Bryce:
>> > Hi all,
>> > The below draft note to SO/AC Chairs was developed by the RT members
>> > during the F2F meeting today. Please read, and share any edits or input
>> > by 23.59 UTC on Sunday 5 November.
>> > ------------------
>> > Dear SO/AC Chairs;
>> > Please find enclosed a description of the SSR2 Review Team’s perspective
>> > the Scope of this review. As requested, the SSR2 is completing
>> > requested item to “[resolve] the issues identified and discussed before
>> > and during ICANN60 related to scope”.
>> > Scope
>> > The SSR2 RT has operated and conducted its work according to its adopted
>> > scope (detailed in its Terms of
>> > Reference<https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/64076120/SSR2-TermsofReference-CLEAN%20v4.0%20ET.docx?version=1&modificationDate=1493887766000&api=v2>
>> > document), which was adopted by consensus of the SSR RT on 4 May 2017.
>> > We would like to offer some general clarifications and comments about
>> > the choices in an overview on the overarching tenets that was adopted
>> > and guided the approach to the development of the scope that we hope
>> > will be helpful to the SO and AC chairs in considering the parameters
>> > associated with resuming this effort:
>> > Breadth vs. Depth: We believe in such a review, that it is more helpful
>> > to look at breadth and look at the broader aspects of security,
>> > stability and resiliency rather than dive into depth in just a small
>> > number of issues. This approach we believe would lend itself to more
>> > informed conclusions that can be contextualized. We have operated as a
>> > team that while we may review a plethora of documents, we have a
>> > fiduciary responsibility to the Community –at-Large to contribute to the
>> > stability of ICANN through sound conclusions and recommendations.
>> > Capability vs. Behaviours: We believe that it is more helpful in the
>> > context of this review to look at the capability of ICANN to manage
>> > issues related to security, stability and resilience rather than being
>> > overly prescriptive as to how ICANN should respond to particular
>> > circumstances that have arisen in the past or may arise in the future.
>> > In this context, our review will also include future threats for
>> > consideration and proactive planning .
>> > Perspective vs. Prescription: We believe that it is more helpful to
>> > review aspects of institutional awareness and capability of topics
>> > related to security, stability, and resiliency, rather than provide a
>> > detailed prescription of the appropriate responses to be used in
>> > particular cases.
>> > We hope this meets your requirements regarding the review team’s
>> > perspective on the scope of this review. The current working terms of
>> > references for the review team’s efforts up to the point of this pause
>> > in our actions, including a detailed view of the scope of the review,
>> > can be found in the reference document cited above.
>> > Please let us know if you require anything further.
>> > Regards,
>> > The Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency Review Team (SSR2 RT)
>> > --
>> > Jennifer Bryce
>> > Senior Reviews Coordinator
>> > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
>> > Email: jennifer.bryce at icann.org
>> > Skype: jennifer.bryce.icann
>> > www.icann.org
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Ssr2-review mailing list
>> > Ssr2-review at icann.org
>> > https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
>> Boban Kršić
>> Chief Information Security Officer
>> DENIC eG, Kaiserstraße 75-77, 60329 Frankfurt am Main, GERMANY
>> E-Mail: krsic at denic.de, Fon: +49 69 272 35-120, Fax: -248
>> Mobil: +49 172 67 61 671
>> PGP Key-ID: 0x43C89BA9
>> Fingerprint: B974 E725 FEF7 CB3A E452 BEE0 5B80 73E9 43C8 9BA9
>> Angaben nach § 25a Absatz 1 GenG:
>> DENIC eG (Sitz: Frankfurt am Main)
>> Vorstand: Helga Krüger, Martin Küchenthal, Andreas Musielak, Dr. Jörg
>> Schweiger Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Thomas Keller Eingetragen unter
>> Nr. 770 im Genossenschaftsregister, Amtsgericht Frankfurt am Main
>> Ssr2-review mailing list
>> Ssr2-review at icann.org
> Ssr2-review mailing list
> Ssr2-review at icann.org
Assistant Lecturer & Coordinator - Microsoft Innovation Center, Tanzania
College of Informatics and Virtual Education
The University of Dodoma (www.udom.ac.tz)
More information about the Ssr2-review