[Ssr2-review] Antwort: Re: Scope document - action needed

Wed Nov 8 04:44:05 UTC 2017

Yes

Regards,
Matogoro

On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Boban Krsic <krsic at denic.de> wrote:

>  Yes.
> Yes.
>
>  --
> Boban Krsic
> Chief Information Security Officer
>
> DENIC eG, Kaiserstraße 75-77, 60329 Frankfurt am Main, GERMANY
>
> E-Mail: krsic at denic.de, Fon: +49 69 272 35-120, Fax: -248
> Mobil: +49 172 67 61 671
> https://www.denic.de
>
> X.509 Key-ID: 00A54FCB79884413A4
> Fingerprint: 9D37 F593 AF9A D766 FAB4 8B88 D49A 2716
>
> PGP Key-ID: 0x43C89BA9
> Fingerprint: B974 E725 FEF7 CB3A E452 BEE0 5B80 73E9 43C8 9BA9
>
> Angaben nach § 25a Absatz 1 GenG:
> DENIC eG (Sitz: Frankfurt am Main)
> Vorstand: Helga Krüger, Martin Küchenthal, Andreas Musielak, Dr. Jörg
> Schweiger
> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Thomas Keller
> Eingetragen unter Nr. 770 im Genossenschaftsregister, Amtsgericht
> Frankfurt am Main
>
>  -----Denise Michel <denisemichel at fb.com> schrieb: -----
>
>  =======================
>  An: SSR2 <ssr2-review at icann.org>
>  Von: Denise Michel <denisemichel at fb.com>
>  Datum: 07.11.2017 20:13
>  Betreff: Re: [Ssr2-review] Scope document - action needed
>  =======================
>    Hi, All.
>
> Included below is the version all Team members were asked to review and
> indicate whether they can support – deadline today (by 11:30 PM Tuesday,
> UTC).   It includes some edits since we left our last Team meeting in Abu
> Dhabi, but the focus and substance remains the same. I think we are very
> close.
>
> Please send a yes or no on this draft by the deadline.  Let us know if you
> need more time, or would like to discuss.
>
> We’re moving this to the email thread as we’re trying to get
> closure/agreement on one version of the document (not a changing google
> doc).
>
> Attached is Geoff Huston’s preferred draft.
>
> As I noted, we hope to achieve full agreement. Absent that, we continue to
> operate by consensus and the Scope document will be delivered to the SO &
> AC chairs this week.
>
> Thanks.
> Denise
>
>
> Denise Michel
> Domain Name System Strategy & Management
> Facebook, Inc.
> denisemichel at fb.com<mailto:denisemichel at fb.com>
>
>
> Dear SO/AC Chairs;
> Please find enclosed a description of the SSR2 Review Team’s perspective
> of the scope of this review. As requested, the SSR2 is completing the
> requested item to “[resolve] the issues identified and discussed before and
> during ICANN60 related to scope.”
> We hope this meets your requirements regarding the Review Team’s
> perspective on the scope of this review. The current Terms of Reference for
> SSR2’s efforts up to the point of this pause in our actions, including a
> detailed view of the scope of the review, can be found here. Additional
> information on SSR2 activities, including the work plan can be found on the
> Review Team’s wiki.
> Please let us know if you require anything further. Regards,
> The Second Security, Stability, and Resiliency of the DNS Review Team
> (SSR2)
> ............
> Scope
> The Security, Stability and Resiliency of the DNS Review Team (SSR2 or
> Review Team) has operated and conducted its work according to its adopted
> scope (detailed in its Terms of Reference document), which was adopted by
> consensus of the Review Team on 4 May 2017.
> We would like to offer an overview on the overarching tenets that were
> adopted and that guided the development of the scope of this review that we
> hope will be helpful to the SO and AC chairs in considering the parameters
> associated with resuming this effort:
> Breadth vs. Depth: In such a review, we believe that it is, in general,
> more helpful to look at breadth and the broader aspects of security,
> stability and resiliency rather than dive into depth in just a small number
> of issues. We believe this approach will lend itself to more informed
> conclusions that can be contextualized.
> Capability vs. Behaviors: We believe that it is more helpful in the
> context of this review to look at the capability of ICANN to manage issues
> related to security, stability and resiliency rather than being overly
> prescriptive as to how ICANN should respond to particular circumstances
> that have arisen in the past or may arise in the future.
> Perspective vs. Prescription: We believe that it is more helpful to review
> aspects of institutional awareness and capability with respect to topics
> related to security, stability, and resiliency, rather than provide a
> detailed prescription of the appropriate responses to be used in particular
> cases.
> Mindful of the Board’s and Staff’s advice regarding the need for
> implementable recommendations, the Review Team will strive to provide
> recommendations that are specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and
> timely (SMART). Where appropriate, this may require precision, depth or
> specific examples for recommendations to be actionable by ICANN Org
> following the review.
>
>
>
> From: Denise Michel <denisemichel at fb.com>
> Date: Monday, November 6, 2017 at 3:46 PM
> To: SSR2 <ssr2-review at icann.org>
> Subject: Scope document - action needed
>
> Hi, Team.
>
> Thank you for your edits and comments.  Please take a look at the draft
> Scope document on google, and share your final thoughts before 23:30 am UTC
> Tuesday, 7 Nov.
>
> It seems like we’re close to full agreement but there are a few
> outstanding items.
>
> Best,
> Denise
>
>
> Denise Michel
> Domain Name System Strategy & Management
> Facebook, Inc.
> denisemichel at fb.com<mailto:denisemichel at fb.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Ssr2-review mailing list
> Ssr2-review at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
>
> [Anhang/Anhänge Scope of the Review Draft - Geoff Huston edits.pdf
> entfernt von Boban Krsic/Denic]
> _______________________________________________
> Ssr2-review mailing list
> Ssr2-review at icann.org
> https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ssr2-review
>

-- 
MATOGORO Jabhera
Assistant Lecturer & Coordinator - Microsoft Innovation Center, Tanzania
College of Informatics and Virtual Education
The University of Dodoma (www.udom.ac.tz)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ssr2-review/attachments/20171108/75a7d3b3/attachment.html>